* bug#57127: unzip fails to cross-compile
@ 2022-08-10 22:06 Andrew Patterson
2022-08-11 0:45 ` Andrew Patterson
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Patterson @ 2022-08-10 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 57127
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 993 bytes --]
unzip fails to build when cross-compiling (at least from x86_64
linux), complaining that '%output' is unbound. It gives identical
errors when compiling for aarch64, riscv64, and arm.
Interestingly, it gives the same errors when explicitly building
for x86_64 on an x86_64 machine, even though I would expect doing
so to compile as normal. When not cross-compiling, unzip
successfully builds as normal on both x86_64 and aarch64.
On my x86_64 machines, 'guix show unzip' does only have
x86_64-linux and i686-linux in the 'systems' list, but that's also
true of htop, which does cross-compile. (Also, why does it do
that? The same command on my aarch64 machine shows many more
system types.)
I'm working on testing if cross-compiling from aarch64 does the
same thing, but building a cross-compilation toolchain on pinebook
pro is very slow.
Steps to reproduce: run 'guix build unzip --target=$TARGET'
Here's the build log from 'guix build unzip
--target=aarch64-linux-gnu':
[-- Attachment #2: build log --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1526 bytes --]
WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core binding `delete'
Backtrace:
In ice-9/eval.scm:
217:50 19 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64c00 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 18 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64ba0 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:?> ?))
217:50 17 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64b80 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 16 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64b60 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 15 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64b40 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 14 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64b20 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 13 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64b00 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 12 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64980 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:?> ?))
217:50 11 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64960 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 10 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64940 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 9 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64920 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 8 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b648c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:?> ?))
217:50 7 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b648a0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 6 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64880 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:50 5 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff4b64860 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:?> ?))
217:33 4 (lp (#<procedure 7ffff5fe9480 at ice-9/eval.scm:212:?> ?))
213:45 3 (_ #f)
196:43 2 (_ #f)
223:20 1 (proc #<directory (guile-user) 7ffff5fdbc80>)
In unknown file:
0 (%resolve-variable (7 . %output) #<directory (guile-use?>)
ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:
Unbound variable: %output
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 22 bytes --]
--
Andrew Patterson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#57127: unzip fails to cross-compile
2022-08-10 22:06 bug#57127: unzip fails to cross-compile Andrew Patterson
@ 2022-08-11 0:45 ` Andrew Patterson
2022-08-11 8:48 ` Maxime Devos
2022-08-11 10:12 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Patterson @ 2022-08-11 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 57127
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 71 bytes --]
Cross-compiling to x86_64 on aarch64 failed the same way. Log
below:
[-- Attachment #2: log of guix build unzip --target=x86_64-linux-gnu on a pbpro --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1520 bytes --]
WARNING: (guile-user): imported module (guix build utils) overrides core binding `delete'
Backtrace:
In ice-9/eval.scm:
217:50 19 (lp (#<procedure 7d93a0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 18 (lp (#<procedure 7d9340 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:6 (env)> ?))
217:50 17 (lp (#<procedure 7d9320 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 16 (lp (#<procedure 7d9300 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 15 (lp (#<procedure 7d92e0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 14 (lp (#<procedure 7d92c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 13 (lp (#<procedure 7d92a0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 12 (lp (#<procedure 7d9120 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:6 (env)> ?))
217:50 11 (lp (#<procedure 7d9100 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 10 (lp (#<procedure 7d90e0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 9 (lp (#<procedure 7d90c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 8 (lp (#<procedure 7d9060 at ice-9/eval.scm:649:6 (env)> ?))
217:50 7 (lp (#<procedure 7d9040 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 6 (lp (#<procedure 7d9020 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:50 5 (lp (#<procedure 7d9000 at ice-9/eval.scm:282:4 (env)> ?))
217:33 4 (lp (#<procedure 6044c0 at ice-9/eval.scm:212:12 (en?> ?))
213:45 3 (_ #f)
196:43 2 (_ #f)
223:20 1 (proc #<directory (guile-user) 5ebc80>)
In unknown file:
0 (%resolve-variable (7 . %output) #<directory (guile-use?>)
ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:
Unbound variable: %output
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 22 bytes --]
--
Andrew Patterson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#57127: unzip fails to cross-compile
2022-08-10 22:06 bug#57127: unzip fails to cross-compile Andrew Patterson
2022-08-11 0:45 ` Andrew Patterson
@ 2022-08-11 8:48 ` Maxime Devos
2022-08-11 10:12 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Devos @ 2022-08-11 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Patterson, 57127
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1176 bytes --]
On 11-08-2022 00:06, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> unzip fails to build when cross-compiling (at least from x86_64
> linux), complaining that '%output' is unbound.
Change #:make-flags to use a G-exp instead of a S-exp and replace the
undocumented %output by the #$output.
For consistency, you can do the same for #:phases.
For simplicity, I recommend not using ` for argument but 'list':
(arguments (list #:phases #~(modify-phases ...) #:make-flags #~(list ...))).
> It gives identical errors when compiling for aarch64, riscv64, and
> arm. Interestingly, it gives the same errors when explicitly building
> for x86_64 on an x86_64 machine, even though I would expect doing so
> to compile as normal.
Technically that's cross-compilation from Guix perspective, though maybe
it should just compile natively in that case.
> On my x86_64 machines, 'guix show unzip' does only have x86_64-linux
> and i686-linux in the 'systems' list, but that's also true of htop,
> which does cross-compile. (Also, why does it do that? The same
> command on my aarch64 machine shows many more system types.)
I don't know.
Greetings,
Maxime.
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 929 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 236 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#57127: unzip fails to cross-compile
2022-08-10 22:06 bug#57127: unzip fails to cross-compile Andrew Patterson
2022-08-11 0:45 ` Andrew Patterson
2022-08-11 8:48 ` Maxime Devos
@ 2022-08-11 10:12 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-08-11 10:28 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2022-08-11 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 57127, andrewpatt7
Hi Andrew,
This is a bug in Guix, not really related to cross-compiling (hence you can stop cross-testing and reporting different architectures, although the effort is appreciated!).
%output is practically deprecated, but is still present in a good number of packages. Sometimes it happens to work, because a specific build system explicitly kept support for it. Some build systems don't, making support for it feel unreliable. It is. %output is obsolete for new code.
What also happens is that build systems still support it in the well-tested native build path, but not when cross-compiling. That seems to be the case here.
> Interestingly, it gives the same errors when explicitly building for x86_64
> on an x86_64 machine, even though I would expect doing so to compile as normal.
You don't define what you mean by 'explicitly building'.
If you mean --target=x86_64-linux-gnu, why would it not fail? You're cross-compiling. Guix doesn't silently fall back to a non-cross build when the architectures match, no should it IMO.
The fix should be simple: rewrite unzip to use gexps and hence #$output. Why didn't I simply do so yet? Because too many packages depend on unzip to simply do so on master. There's probably a way around that, but I'll try it when I'm back at a computer.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-11 18:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-10 22:06 bug#57127: unzip fails to cross-compile Andrew Patterson
2022-08-11 0:45 ` Andrew Patterson
2022-08-11 8:48 ` Maxime Devos
2022-08-11 10:12 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-08-11 10:28 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2022-08-11 18:11 ` Andrew Patterson
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.