From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Manolis Ragkousis <manolis837@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: grep: Fix for gnulib library.
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:37:13 +0200
Message-ID: <45ea0fec-4129-f996-9022-c3358241c1c9@gmail.com>
References: <03bd79adfd93b2e828510a3250e6690d@openmailbox.org>
	<87o9x882ym.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35571)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <manolis837@gmail.com>) id 1cmj5F-0002j1-Ok
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:37:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <manolis837@gmail.com>) id 1cmj5A-00050K-T7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:37:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87o9x882ym.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>, rennes@openmailbox.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hello Ludo,

On 03/11/2017 01:31 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> rennes@openmailbox.org skribis:
> 
>> From f76585a44afdc41187df768eec79fb723713cf0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: rennes <rennes@openmailbox.org>
>> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:21:49 -0600
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: grep: Fix for gnulib library.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/patches/grep-gnulib-lock.patch: New file.                                                  
>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> 
> Looks like we missed this ‘core-updates’ cycle.  :-/
> 
> To apply it without triggering a full rebuild, you could instead add a
> phase that invokes ‘patch’ to apply it, only when the cross-compilation
> target or system is GNU/Hurd.
> 
> Like:
> 
>   ,@(if (gnu/hurd?)
>         `((add-before 'configure 'patch …))
>         '())  ;nothing
> 
> Could you try that?

Even though this would work, maybe we should wait for the next
core-updates circle in order to avoid more (if (hurd)..) patches.

Rene WDYT?

Manolis