From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Quiliro_Ord=C3=B3=C3=B1ez?= Subject: Re: personal communications server Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:28:14 -0700 Message-ID: <43325349a6b00be70521039c3b5c3618@riseup.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48411) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1huieY-0000HD-71 for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:28:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huieX-0002GK-87 for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:28:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:33974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1huieW-0002Fn-U5 for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:28:17 -0400 Received: from piha.riseup.net (piha-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 549411A10B0 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 12:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piha.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2598A1C0274 for ; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 12:28:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix@gnu.org PING El 2019-07-18 23:42, Quiliro Ord=C3=B3=C3=B1ez escribi=C3=B3: > Hello Guix: >=20 > I know this has been discussed in the past in this: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-05/msg00210.html > and on another thread on Guix mailing lists. But I cannot find any > information past 2017. >=20 > I have read about: > https://freedombox.org/ > https://freedombone.org/ > But the first does not have an email server and I could not manage to > get the second working. >=20 > On the other hand, how can a communication system be secure if it canno= t > be audited? The only option for auditability is a reproducible system > that has the source code available. That plus freedom is only currently > obtainable on Guix. >=20 > Is there any current discussion or ideas about this?