From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Garlick Subject: Re: Video narration Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 16:16:04 +0100 Message-ID: <3f393bb53fa8d04c0e9ae33df1eeadaf864940d5.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> References: <68df0dd806a3e7f55db08feb70d246263bb6b47f.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <6c27e60e2909fd7ff3f85237e181e9a8a4e63468.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <05bf11a582920d81ffa1494e6eb2f5e85503638e.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <871s313bth.fsf@elephly.net> <660de50483d54150fa1ca67ebd0cae886d0ffcbe.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <52a3d40df1ee349f48e7ecd79756e9307cbae034.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <5893d6b8dc2dd4ed1cdcab3e109ce655d82bc493.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <6f60665f899c24133818106831f378f087b9d405.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <808a07682b858d44b1e48c69fd98fcb770837789.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <0f4db135b01c57d8ab2fbf6721587664507dcefc.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hAyfU-0000BJ-II for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 11:16:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hAyfT-0006bJ-87 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 11:16:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Laura Lazzati Cc: Guix-devel Hi Laura, I have finished updating the transcripts and I am preparing to do the recordings tomorrow. One question about the makefile: am I right in thinking that the makefile automatically adjusts the duration of each slide according to the duration of the corresponding audio file? In other words it would not matter if I supply audio files that are slightly longer (or shorter) than your originals? > Shouldn't the 'guix environment' step be later in the list of steps? > If I was packaging the aspi package I would do: > > $ guix environment --pure r-aspi > The environment was set up in the first packaging video. As far as I > am concerned, the idea is to have a clean guix environment and > package > everything there. If you are using a foreign distro then I believe > that it could not be reproducible if you package it first. > Please, let the others correct me if I am wrong. I think that this question has to do with the complexity of the package. The aspi example is a simple case that does not have any dependencies outside the R build system. For a more complex package (newPackage, for example) using: $ guix environment --pure guix $ guix build newPackage would fail if newPackage has extra inputs. Instead, the commands should be: $ guix environment --pure newPackage $ guix build newPackage I think this would be easy to communicate to new users if steps 1 and 2 are switched on Slide 2 and I add some extra words to the transcript. Do you (and others) agree? Best regards, Paul.