From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id CF2bE3SK5mG0NwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:37:56 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id AER9DHSK5mF3eAEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:37:56 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667773934B for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:37:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34986 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9kw5-0002kZ-JA for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:37:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9kur-0000bL-0r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:36:38 -0500 Received: from [2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19] (port=52432 helo=laurent.telenet-ops.be) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n9kup-0007uj-26 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 04:36:36 -0500 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyhxw7psv60dyze.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:3c5f:2eff:feb0:ba5a]) by laurent.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id k9cW2600E4UW6Th019cW5h; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:36:31 +0100 Message-ID: <39f140d0b457887b555c39ca2827580584450857.camel@telenet.be> Subject: Re: Parallel guix builds can trample? From: Maxime Devos To: Phil Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:36:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87mtjtfl4q.fsf@beadling.co.uk> References: <877db6ge0o.fsf@beadling.co.uk> <874k697thf.fsf@elephly.net> <87r19d5pcw.fsf@elephly.net> <871r1dguq6.fsf@beadling.co.uk> <7a2e92a6871fa2e40b749d8e4bfc6aa811df0a22.camel@telenet.be> <87mtjtfl4q.fsf@beadling.co.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XxEM8kwH08OO1UeELFtR" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r22; t=1642498591; bh=mDqv43CgUlJeIjoC8Jy4EAozdnj+AT4m2FNfg8FusPo=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=MbHaOwKHqIk6ZZ8+IEeOMEKyXdqqUDXzyqArh1HHMi7KEzYdLsNHPTqjL8m0DaaMO 5jqMH9rcZGMHEi1ZUda+M8Gd9Jxh1ezgvcNym/fENq6YdaCbVpzLcRI0ptDddpEqgt 497v3tOknGECwfLd715/rtXloGSr2wgoqBgAuUw3k0kGxpG90Lw4FruEY1F666ekVG SjEwmSmVMt9rHhOKSUxUIz+dZm2j2J5RgHBJDDLsIGQk2rFoAuW/XipUm86peXPoHE aU7KCeMPD2Pp5l90nhJknj1BYZDkHr+B+lbVMhdB03oseF3OV5kqxOHC9ogUBMiTP9 dqaxrCIY8/d/g== X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:1800:110:4::f00:19; envelope-from=maximedevos@telenet.be; helo=laurent.telenet-ops.be X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1642498674; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=mDqv43CgUlJeIjoC8Jy4EAozdnj+AT4m2FNfg8FusPo=; b=Un7YIDv6v1lCkOypKOiWV0rO+cYDmAmJL2WVIqFImD69MXz07EypX6neVNf7uGbNChbguC Vo1obzs9gQFOL9raQBm1Y+XQT5wvZJqlCvSnpg6ZuRLDQ/+XM3J2EquQnk/cLkFreZn+55 S4T9hnzC0eKkRT2PI2d6ynFK45fXb7Wjdfk3vugfDcpctfC8fSL8APJaPclDbc01p23qms 0BOiL11r/ViYxs43RG5gnznnugYtk71VK3W4SVT23ueAY4fxKnNtbEOe6QIW8h5RzJa37E 6mR5FeYHbS0i+gwp19uiv5jcEqnnp50Nxdt00rXSDeXiMaNFAADyGYsWsgKBfQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1642498674; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=AeVrWDa9W2ymI9KRGU40kx47MrXkrMc5iqqz/RQawTY4N+mLHFbGyhD9BAEnoGU6h9naEO nK9VkW4mPGp76pXxHyN9kVLxBkGbJOr7WjxIBRdt7pUHAqH2v0ulMfRUiSlcCTC9U1E6kk Wx5fwsoP9wTC5kXhVggGkayfyoihG5IJaSzKiYFZC3UznO4jdKbYGkQU/kiIM4weglsrWM Qf5PZT8C3ZLp7NICjesA2/jBZabYj2ts5uKuvJzjl9XEXtdlyP7UBgJSXZbyr+lPatAVHy nHH/3tvgqJRrd0sIeLntOTbc5unRKRk15l084l/fMusx4L1vfa5Uw2puEOmEyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=telenet.be header.s=r22 header.b=MbHaOwKH; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=telenet.be (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.71 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=telenet.be header.s=r22 header.b=MbHaOwKH; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=telenet.be (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 667773934B X-Spam-Score: -3.71 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: shlJtfnYGXdH --=-XxEM8kwH08OO1UeELFtR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Phil schreef op di 18-01-2022 om 09:28 [+0000]: > To mitigate performance concerns, I think it's possible to set the > branches and depth in git such that we only clone the bare-bones only?. IIUC libgit2 and the Guile bindings guile-git do not currently support shallow clones (depth, etc.). Bare-bones should be possible though. Greetings, Maxime. --=-XxEM8kwH08OO1UeELFtR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYeaKFxccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7tzCAQD7KWuyDrEyKu4DlN1uGxZsWL7k FJBJJj6dScnmr3+/YwEAxLLxvU/j6d0t/smWWR0HjzeNzUV874Qhamb98VPguAQ= =vRRB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XxEM8kwH08OO1UeELFtR--