From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com>
Subject: Re: Naming, hacking, and policies
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 13:03:56 -0500
Message-ID: <35445297-9d2b-5b0a-241a-63f9193d77fb@zoho.com>
References: <875zs3pg5b.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wokhhj8n.fsf@nckx>
	<20190329151636.GA5681@jurong> <87wokh638t.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<502f27e8-00e7-8ca1-ba36-13d539b9eca3@zoho.com>
	<87imvzyp7t.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49528)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sirgazil@zoho.com>) id 1hAeoV-0002eb-IM
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 14:04:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sirgazil@zoho.com>) id 1hAeoU-00017e-E2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Mar 2019 14:04:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87imvzyp7t.fsf@gnu.org>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=c3=a8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org



El 31/03/19 a las 11:37 a. m., Ludovic Court=C3=A8s escribi=C3=B3:
> Hi sirgazil,
>=20
> sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis:
>=20
>> I don't know exactly what should be done in Guix, though, but I think
>> having a "system name" and a "pretty name" that is translatable could
>> help a little bit.
>=20
> It=E2=80=99s a tricky topic indeed (and not specific to Guix).
>=20
> There are i18n and accessibility (a11n) issues, I agree.  The problem is
> that those =E2=80=9Csystem names=E2=80=9D are essentially identifiers, pr=
etty much like
> Unix command names.  Sometimes they=E2=80=99re abbreviations of common En=
glish
> names, sometimes they=E2=80=99re proper names, etc.  So not all of them a=
re
> subject to translation.  I think they should really be treated like
> identifiers in programming languages or command names.


Oh yeah, I'm not suggesting to translate "system names", but have both=20
"system names" and "pretty names", and only the latter would be=20
internationalized :)


> Now, having synopses and descriptions that are actual text subject to
> translation certainly helps.  Maybe we could do better, but I wouldn=E2=
=80=99t
> know how!
>=20
> Thanks,
> Ludo=E2=80=99.
>=20

--=20
Luis Felipe L=C3=B3pez Acevedo
http://sirgazil.bitbucket.io/