From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add haveged. Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 01:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <353fccdc-2726-49cf-113d-e4c30cd2187b@tobias.gr> References: <20160723220946.13044-1-me@tobias.gr> <20160723224707.GC23753@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37546) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bR6aN-0008MS-6U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 19:44:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bR6aL-0000ft-AN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 19:43:58 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:55060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bR6aL-0000fp-3u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 19:43:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160723224707.GC23753@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo, On 24/07/2016 0:47, Leo Famulari wrote: > I would use 'non-copyleft'. There's an example in the libbsd package and > several others. That's the one. I've added: (license:non-copyleft "file://nist/mconf.h") (license:non-copyleft "file://nist/packtest.h") ... but many packages — not all — also like to add a "See in the distribution." Looking at guix/licenses.scm, this seems a bit redundant to me. No? > Otherwise, the package looks good to me, thanks! Thanks! I'll push (\o/) in a day or so if no-one else comments. Kind regards, T G-R