From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hartmut Goebel Subject: Re: qtwenengine anybody? Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 15:57:45 +0100 Message-ID: <31765744-6c8f-9fae-bc52-c79c6a3a370d@crazy-compilers.com> References: <87a77sqtdq.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87immgqryj.fsf@gmail.com> <871rt4qnp9.fsf@gmail.com> <87immgp582.fsf@gmail.com> <5955729d-ef57-ffb8-feb8-36a9f53658a2@crazy-compilers.com> <87d0clpbt6.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2v7e0g4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9qb56gg.fsf@gmail.com> <87sglfotvj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o8w354m5.fsf@gmail.com> <87blrod2so.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <878smsd2pe.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87mub7krlq.fsf@gmail.com> <87tv5e9acb.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871rsilshf.fsf@gmail.com> <87imltk3mz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1inOOh-0007AQ-6I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 09:57:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1inOOf-0003b6-PP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 09:57:55 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:58531) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1inOOf-0003MI-Ci for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 09:57:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87imltk3mz.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: mike.rosset@gmail.com Cc: Guix-devel Am 02.01.20 um 21:24 schrieb mike.rosset@gmail.com: > Apologies this is probably a failure in my ML workflow. And just my luck > I'm in the process of doing some working related moving todoy. Here is a > complete diff > https://gitlab.com/mike.rosset/guix/compare/master...qtwebengine hope > this helps. Many thanks, this is quite helpful. For me it looks okay except of two minor points: - The description should contain at least a brief note about Qt patched the embedded chromium to (partially) un-google it. If you know details, this would be great. This of course could be enhanced later, since changing the description does not force a rebuild of he package. - Please still honor Ricardo's remark about DRM and phoning home. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |