From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Lilypond.
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:17:14 -0500
Message-ID: <30b4e906c3005d0794db4b0b642280bc@openmailbox.org>
References: <87fv9f8tnz.fsf@mango.localdomain>
	<4f4a3e65a02ff3123d15edf64781de6b@openmailbox.org>
	<20150309210338.GA25847@debian> <871tkx98zg.fsf@mango.localdomain>
Reply-To: bavier@member.fsf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40787)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bavier@member.fsf.org>) id 1YV53C-000882-V8
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:17:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bavier@member.fsf.org>) id 1YV538-000584-Rp
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:17:22 -0400
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:44413)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bavier@member.fsf.org>) id 1YV538-00057k-Lo
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:17:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <871tkx98zg.fsf@mango.localdomain>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On 2015-03-09 16:06, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Andreas Enge writes:
> 
>> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 03:43:01PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote:
>>> I think lilypond deserves its own module (gnu packages lilypond).  
>>> What do
>>> others think?
>> 
>> How about a name that could also accept GNU Denemo? music.scm? 
>> score.scm?
> 
> I would prefer music.scm, so that also GNU Solfege could find a better
> home than audio.scm.

Sounds good to me.

`~Eric