From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#40518: guix pull: Dependency guix-packages-base fails
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:03:51 +0900
Message-ID: <2EXPIM22USD15.3L4PAFHXMY9H2@wilsonb.com>
References: <3DTCFZZAVGJ4B.22Q96Q868VFQ8@wilsonb.com>
 <87lfn53skg.fsf@gnu.org> <1Z6E7NH7WBPL4.3SGTTMBBYVN5C@wilsonb.com>
 <87zhbk1xsn.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: elaexuotee@wilsonb.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="----_=_230242ae1add2ec218952785_=_"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36133)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jMiXX-0006tZ-Gq
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 21:33:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jMiXW-00044T-Jn
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 21:33:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43137)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jMiXW-00044B-Dt
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 21:33:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jMiXW-0001lQ-AK
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 21:33:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40518.B40518.15864823576746@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87zhbk1xsn.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 40518@debbugs.gnu.org

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

------_=_230242ae1add2ec218952785_=_
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_601dccc44151d52228f97518_=_"

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

------_=_601dccc44151d52228f97518_=_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> It could be an out-of-memory (OOM) condition: this build phase is
> unfortunately very demanding currently (at least 2=C2=A0GiB or RAM I thin=
k).
> How much RAM do you have?

I think we have a winner. This is running on a VM and I just realized it
it only runs with 500MB of ram.

So, if I am understanding correctly, for some reason the original pull
didn't have an available substitute; however, when I later tried again
the new HEAD referenced a guix-packages-base which *did* have a
substitute available?

Cheers.

------_=_601dccc44151d52228f97518_=_--

------_=_230242ae1add2ec218952785_=_
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYIADUWIQQ7FdZn/PDWvxE6cmR2pStZ7i7CgQUCXo/F7RccZWxhZXh1b3Rl
ZUB3aWxzb25iLmNvbQAKCRB2pStZ7i7CgXq7AP42LEyGFLVYIYJCoEoARmVdFvkv
j+KvcFzO4m/6JdYG8QD+MvkrBbkLX8W2T01AlP9sqIuHBQ5AH4fZ9T4yeyFNzAk=
=fdaH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------_=_230242ae1add2ec218952785_=_--