From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56877)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ioei1-00030x-5U
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 21:35:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ioehz-0004Sh-71
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 21:35:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41121)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1ioehy-0004Ro-9c
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 21:35:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ioehy-0002F5-2G
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 21:35:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#38965] [PATCH 00/12] gnu: coq: Update to 8.10.2.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38965.B38965.15783644848590@debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 21:34:34 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87o8vgm37i.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <874kx9xa9u.fsf@gnu.org>
 <53E54994-18D2-4D82-8E96-3D6E8A3A9D14@lepiller.eu> <87o8vgm37i.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller.eu>
Message-ID: <2E36EFCF-C7C0-442B-8F03-46CC3167DA92@lepiller.eu>
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org>
Cc: 38965@debbugs.gnu.org

Le 6 janvier 2020 21:04:49 GMT-05:00, Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu=2Eorg> a =C3=
=A9crit :
>Julien Lepiller <julien@lepiller=2Eeu> writes:
>
>> Le 6 janvier 2020 03:24:29 GMT-05:00, Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu=2Eorg> a
>=C3=A9crit :
>>>
>>
>> Looks like lablgtk2 -> ocaml-cairo2 -> lablgtk3 so we can't get rid
>of lablgtk2=2E Are we sure we need it though?
>>
>> In general, make sure to run guix lint on these patches, I could spot
>missing double spaces in descriptions of the first two for instance=2E
>
>The OPAM page for cairo2 does not mention needing lablgtk2=2E So, if that
>is the case I imagine we could be fine deprecating it in favor of
>lablgtk3=2E
>
>I forgot to lint those who packages, yes=2E I can change those before
>pushing them=2E How does everything else look?

The rest looks pretty good :)=2E The introduction of (gnu packages autotoo=
ls) is too late though, it should be added on the first patch that needs it=
 (5 I think)=2E