From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] gnu: Add deal.II.
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:55:44 -0500
Message-ID: <29e4b7a8c7bd81f13db9edb5d0491928@openmailbox.org>
References: <1435463151-32099-1-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
	<1435463151-32099-15-git-send-email-ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
	<87lhf3twfn.fsf@gnu.org> <20150628110535.42177fd6@openmailbox.org>
	<20150628210949.GA8410@debian> <87a8virjqj.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52054)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>) id 1ZA1dI-0006ev-6W
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:55:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>) id 1ZA1dF-0007e6-0j
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:55:51 -0400
Received: from smtp19.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.53]:42666)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>) id 1ZA1dE-0007dY-Ai
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:55:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a8virjqj.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: ludo@gnu.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org>

On 2015-06-29 03:39, ludo@gnu.org wrote:
> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>=20
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:05:35AM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote:
>>> I would prefer to keep "deal.II" for the name at least, because that=20
>>> it
>>> the software's declared name, despite the domain and tarball being
>>> "dealii".  Are there arguments against it?
>>=20
>> The package naming conventions. We always transform to lowercase, and=20
>> replace
>> special characters by "-". So both "dealii" (as the tarball name) and
>> "deal-ii" (transformation of the project name) would be fine.
>=20
> +1
>=20
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

Thanks for the clarification.  I ended up pushing with the "dealii"=20
name.

--=20
`~Eric