From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swedebugia Subject: Re: 05/15: gnu: wesnoth: Rename package to the-battle-for-wesnoth. Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:57:08 +0100 Message-ID: <2870d3b9-7cd6-b5cf-e8a0-fb04335f8fed@riseup.net> References: <875zs3pg5b.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wokhhj8n.fsf@nckx> <20190329151636.GA5681@jurong> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pP1eAU7D3Add1Bd9cJq77WKheKCsS2Cie" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9xao-00024y-Op for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:55:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9xan-0006xN-KK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:55:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:35574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9xam-0006wc-GK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:55:09 -0400 Received: from capuchin.riseup.net (capuchin-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 940C71A6511 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by capuchin.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD9BD1205E8 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:55:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20190329151636.GA5681@jurong> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --pP1eAU7D3Add1Bd9cJq77WKheKCsS2Cie Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1HvvNumf8zAwum8Wa2i2WzRvb5DWDp6vf"; protected-headers="v1" From: swedebugia To: guix-devel@gnu.org Message-ID: <2870d3b9-7cd6-b5cf-e8a0-fb04335f8fed@riseup.net> Subject: Re: 05/15: gnu: wesnoth: Rename package to the-battle-for-wesnoth. References: <875zs3pg5b.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wokhhj8n.fsf@nckx> <20190329151636.GA5681@jurong> In-Reply-To: <20190329151636.GA5681@jurong> --1HvvNumf8zAwum8Wa2i2WzRvb5DWDp6vf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2019-03-29 16:16, Andreas Enge wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> I still think this change should be reverted >=20 > I also think so. Agreed, I remember having proposed and gotten a 1 name change through the patch-review-process and that worked fine and that I had to deprecate the old name properly to get it accepted. Pierre would you be willing to prepare some patches to include the long names/project names in the descriptions instead and send them to the patches-list? >=20 > The wording in the naming guidelines is intentionally a bit vague; > the intention was definitely to take in general the tarball name, or ma= ybe > if this does not fit the domain name or something "similarly canonical"= =2E > The tarball name does not always work, for instance in cases where it i= s > "v0.15.zip". So we cannot have a strict rule, but the idea was to take = the > "canonical short name". When writing the section, I did not expect this= > part to lead to controversies; the real question was how to handle spec= ial > characters (lowercase, replace underscores with dashes), and what to do= > for (at the time) python packages. >=20 > I am happy to make the wording clearer. But I am not sure whether repla= cing > "project name" by "package name" makes a difference. What is a "package= "? > But if you think it is better, why not. >=20 > We could also add "short" in front of "projet"/"package name", and mayb= e > add that this usually corresponds to something like the base name of th= e > tarball, the git repository name or the domain where the project is hos= ted. >=20 > What do you think? =F0=9F=91=8D --=20 Cheers Swedebugia --1HvvNumf8zAwum8Wa2i2WzRvb5DWDp6vf-- --pP1eAU7D3Add1Bd9cJq77WKheKCsS2Cie Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYIAB0WIQR6IWNlOiLn9hD6a1XPzUNbKAts0gUCXJ54lAAKCRDPzUNbKAts 0vBIAP9pElIiRyVak8X+MisukVA/vbzDHQnerMrkM1ck2ah58gD+MbBYEzEPew6h v6tb6//22lxJP2QQEDWCovhK4Q+XTAE= =k5IY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pP1eAU7D3Add1Bd9cJq77WKheKCsS2Cie--