From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55809)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1is6UD-0007Uu-Aw
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:51:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1is6U9-0002PZ-QC
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:51:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59269)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1is6U9-0002PS-N4
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:51:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1is6U9-0007AE-MO
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:51:01 -0500
Subject: [bug#38865] [PATCH]  add package definition for liquid-dsp-1.3.2
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38865.D38865.157918621327478@debbugs.gnu.org>
Message-ID: <27914b6c6988025b381f18431f5dbddc28fa6ea4.camel@librehacker.com>
From: Christopher Howard <christopher@librehacker.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 05:49:57 -0900
In-Reply-To: <87h80vg4js.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <937849de433222cab5f2da618529ce3aad559546.camel@librehacker.com>
 <87d0bss243.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv52n4ae.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87c412487b95a94fcbb7b9cbc133ddb1bd9b7819.camel@librehacker.com>
 <87imlcph38.fsf@gnu.org> <ca311c53-d0db-4570-bb25-3d7b57161dcb@localhost>
 <87h80vg4js.fsf@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>, Evan Straw <evan.straw99@gmail.com>
Cc: 38865-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org>

Most of the things currently in and proposed for ham-radio.scm would
fit also under the category of SDR. The one exception would be the
"chirp" package, which is not precisely an SDR application, but a tool
for reprogramming radios. But it might be close enough to be
practically lumped into that file. Strickly speaking, chirp is not
exclusively a ham radio tool other, but could be used by anyone
commercial or otherwise who needed to reprogram a radio.

-- 
Christopher Howard
p: +1 (907) 374-0257
w: https://librehacker.com
social: https://gnusocial.club/librehacker
gpg: ADDEAADE5D607C8D (keys.gnupg.net)

On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 09:59 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Evan,
> 
> Evan Straw <evan.straw99@gmail.com> skribis:
> 
> > I think the only problem that this will introduce is that my redsea
> > package definition in my third patch depends on the definition for
> > liquid-dsp being in the same file, so an import will have to be
> > added. I can submit a revision for this in a few hours when I get
> > back on my PC, if needed.
> 
> Sure, no rush.  An option would be to move all your packages to
> sdr.scm
> (“SDR” is a superset of “ham radio”, after all).  WDYT?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.