* bug#43062: --expose in vm does not reflect file modifications in guest
@ 2020-08-27 2:04 elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2020-08-28 14:11 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2020-08-27 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 43062
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3165 bytes --]
## Overview
When using --expose to mirror a path between host and guest, the guest mirror
fails to reflect file modifications from the host. However, file creation and
deletion are correctly propogated.
To pick up file modifications in the guest, it is sufficient to remount
mirroring 9p filesystem.
Is this behaviour expected?
## Reproduction
The following should be sufficient to reproduce the issue:
Create a container and expose a path:
host$ guix system --expose /some/path vm.scm
/gnu/store/<hash>-run-vm.sh
Spin up the vm:
host$ /gnu/store/<hash>-run-vm.sh
From the host, create a new file under /some/path, and check that the guest
sees this file:
host$ touch /some/path/test
guest$ cat /some/path/test
<file is empty>
Now change the contents of this file on the host, and verify that the guest
does not see the change:
host$ echo foo >/some/path/test
guest$ cat /some/path/test
<file is empty>
Finally, remount the filesystem at /some/path, and see that the guest now picks
up the changes:
guest$ sudo mount -o remount,ro /some/path
guest$ cat /some/path/test
foo
## Version Information
$ guix describe
Generation 123 Aug 25 2020 23:19:12 (current)
guix 253fcfe
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: master
commit: 253fcfe6fec8fb9d70cde8623fe562dc3ca67262
$ cat vm.scm
(use-modules (gnu))
(use-service-modules networking ssh)
(use-package-modules admin linux ncurses tmux)
(operating-system
(host-name "fmadio")
(timezone "Asia/Tokyo")
(locale "en_US.utf8")
(bootloader (bootloader-configuration (bootloader #f) (target #f)))
(kernel linux-libre-4.9)
(file-systems %base-file-systems)
(users (cons (user-account
(name "x")
(password (crypt "x" "Jr1er07l0lOUQ95GQLijow=="))
(group "users")
(supplementary-groups '("wheel")))
%base-user-accounts))
(packages (cons* ncurses tcpdump tmux %base-packages))
(services (cons* (service dhcp-client-service-type)
(service openssh-service-type)
%base-services)))
## Notes
In the above, I am running linux-libre@4.9 in the guest, but another user on
#guix confirmed the issue with linux-libre@5.8. The same user reported seeing
the following after modifying the host file and remounting in the guest:
guest$ cat /some/path/test
[ 49.263620] FS-Cache: Duplicate cookie detected
[ 49.263644] FS-Cache: O-cookie c=00000000fe189610 [p=000000004224ad86 fl=226 nc=0 na=1]
[ 49.263664] FS-Cache: O-cookie d=0000000023080181 n=00000000825c3154
[ 49.263680] FS-Cache: O-key=[8] 'c3f51c0500000000'
[ 49.263695] FS-Cache: N-cookie c=00000000c11e31c7 [p=000000004224ad86 fl=2 nc=0 na=1]
[ 49.263715] FS-Cache: N-cookie d=0000000023080181 n=00000000dad562d4
[ 49.263731] FS-Cache: N-key=[8] 'c3f51c0500000000'
foo
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#43062: --expose in vm does not reflect file modifications in guest
2020-08-27 2:04 bug#43062: --expose in vm does not reflect file modifications in guest elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
@ 2020-08-28 14:11 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-08-29 6:38 ` elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2020-08-30 18:23 ` Christopher Baines
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2020-08-28 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 43062, elaexuotee
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 730 bytes --]
Hi,
elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> skribis:
> When using --expose to mirror a path between host and guest, the guest mirror
> fails to reflect file modifications from the host. However, file creation and
> deletion are correctly propogated.
>
> To pick up file modifications in the guest, it is sufficient to remount
> mirroring 9p filesystem.
>
> Is this behaviour expected?
I believe this comes from the “cache=loose” 9p mount option added in
commit e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879.
Does the patch below help?
Chris, what do you think? How would this affect the performance issues
that led to e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 529 bytes --]
diff --git a/gnu/system/vm.scm b/gnu/system/vm.scm
index 861f2a427a..80a8618729 100644
--- a/gnu/system/vm.scm
+++ b/gnu/system/vm.scm
@@ -699,7 +699,8 @@ of the GNU system as described by OS."
(device (file-system->mount-tag source))
(type "9p")
(flags (if writable? '() '(read-only)))
- (options "trans=virtio,cache=loose")
+ (options (string-append "trans=virtio"
+ (if writable? "" ",cache=loose")))
(check? #f)
(create-mount-point? #t)))))
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#43062: --expose in vm does not reflect file modifications in guest
2020-08-28 14:11 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2020-08-29 6:38 ` elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2020-08-30 18:23 ` Christopher Baines
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix @ 2020-08-29 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Christopher Baines, 43062
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 341 bytes --]
> I believe this comes from the “cache=loose” 9p mount option added in
> commit e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879.
>
> Does the patch below help?
Yes, when no caching behaviour is specified in the guest, the problem
disappears. I also tried cache=fscache and see the exact same problem as with
cache=loose.
Cheers!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#43062: --expose in vm does not reflect file modifications in guest
2020-08-28 14:11 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-08-29 6:38 ` elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
@ 2020-08-30 18:23 ` Christopher Baines
2020-08-31 13:52 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Baines @ 2020-08-30 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: elaexuotee, 43062
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 924 bytes --]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
> Hi,
>
> elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> When using --expose to mirror a path between host and guest, the guest mirror
>> fails to reflect file modifications from the host. However, file creation and
>> deletion are correctly propogated.
>>
>> To pick up file modifications in the guest, it is sufficient to remount
>> mirroring 9p filesystem.
>>
>> Is this behaviour expected?
>
> I believe this comes from the “cache=loose” 9p mount option added in
> commit e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879.
>
> Does the patch below help?
>
> Chris, what do you think? How would this affect the performance issues
> that led to e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879?
Caching only for readonly filesystems sounds fine, I think I was only
thinking about the store for e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 962 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* bug#43062: --expose in vm does not reflect file modifications in guest
2020-08-30 18:23 ` Christopher Baines
@ 2020-08-31 13:52 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2020-08-31 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Baines; +Cc: elaexuotee, 43062-done
Hello!
Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> skribis:
>>
>>> When using --expose to mirror a path between host and guest, the guest mirror
>>> fails to reflect file modifications from the host. However, file creation and
>>> deletion are correctly propogated.
>>>
>>> To pick up file modifications in the guest, it is sufficient to remount
>>> mirroring 9p filesystem.
>>>
>>> Is this behaviour expected?
>>
>> I believe this comes from the “cache=loose” 9p mount option added in
>> commit e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879.
>>
>> Does the patch below help?
>>
>> Chris, what do you think? How would this affect the performance issues
>> that led to e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879?
>
> Caching only for readonly filesystems sounds fine, I think I was only
> thinking about the store for e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879.
Alright, I went ahead and did that in
7eeb78157d3d0267ce4a4ea38ff56a2c4246c11b.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-31 13:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-08-27 2:04 bug#43062: --expose in vm does not reflect file modifications in guest elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2020-08-28 14:11 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-08-29 6:38 ` elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2020-08-30 18:23 ` Christopher Baines
2020-08-31 13:52 ` Ludovic Courtès
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.