From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id KKlIE2hLsV7MHAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 11:18:00 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id CMUXNHJLsV7MSAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 11:18:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70D36940053 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 11:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVvaT-0000NT-Ju for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:18:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVvaM-0000NE-QS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:18:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVvaM-0000PR-H5 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:18:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVvaM-00017s-AC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41038: gcc creates binaries that don't find their shared libraries Resent-From: Bruno Haible Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 11:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41038 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 41038-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41038.15886774634300 (code B ref 41038); Tue, 05 May 2020 11:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 41038) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 May 2020 11:17:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34878 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVva3-00017I-89 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:17:43 -0400 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.162]:25675) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jVva0-000178-QU for 41038@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 07:17:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1588677459; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=DeFff/MDuoLOn6EKtzdq+FVuYpokNgFGuLifRZtX3+8=; b=qU7BvQVQOLR79h8QdaxzXRNMB8ImcjVLcAXyPFquFukOVZCeYnXXUIWBVmMVYQdP95 Gg7+DYPiJqGdgXOlrvshZsLLOw9fsyCMROFzJ3Qq9nFsOItQCdTYuzEbX9mlrAG2gs8a mCbY/0GRH3Wr4p6386MOcwtTlsdIWLG3rctgYnHiyWbcktX7Z2O6svQJmWUP59zDZKUH Gnaqt+JqlwBmBtFDrF5CygjTrLPIChZ9s7WbeoUYSiyy/PSWwJ6KTy0aFfYwNq4CyYtu ORqqcdcowT07E62AychgnfnfEAIFBdAl1PM6Ey1dYR+wpMQsTtK8mI/XzXrokZ/nUA0j UXdQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOH6fzxfs=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from bruno.haible.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 46.6.2 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id j093d3w45BHb0jY (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Tue, 5 May 2020 13:17:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Bruno Haible Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 13:17:36 +0200 Message-ID: <2182276.0QAfrSD9Gv@omega> User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-177-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <87mu6mn2yp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1928431.D5bU72YO8c@omega> <20200504001203.74597aad@scratchpost.org> <87mu6mn2yp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41038@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=clisp.org header.s=strato-dkim-0002 header.b=qU7BvQVQ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.49 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49545626824246]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.13), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[clisp.org:s=strato-dkim-0002]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[clisp.org:-]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[bruno@clisp.org,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[clisp.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: AynaVX/GxyTh Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > I tried hard to avoid > having a wrapper at all but came to the conclusion that this was the > best we could do Can something be done to avoid that installing the packages 'glibc' and 'binutils' shadows this wrapper? Maybe moving the wrapper to a different package than it is now? Or adding specific metainformation to some packages? Bruno