From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Diane Trout Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add BLESS (was: Re: Bioinformatics package: Bless) Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 08:01:20 -0800 Message-ID: <2145107.16HSTAjbbq@myrada> References: <2238503.mBpvBuW9qZ@myrada> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZujSC-0008St-OW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:01:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZujS8-0003Qy-L5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:01:28 -0500 Received: from chaos.caltech.edu ([131.215.34.119]:44626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZujS8-0003Q7-Fy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:01:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org That patch looks much nicer. Thank you. Diane On Friday, November 06, 2015 03:28:23 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Hi, >=20 > > One of our users asked me to install a package "bless" that require= d a > > newer version of MPI than Debian provides, so I thought I'd try to = build > > a guix package as Guix actually has openmpi 1.8 packaged. >=20 > Great! Thank you for your contribution. >=20 > > The source tarball has the GPL-3 LICENSE file, however it does also= > > contain > > convenience copies of other source, and in my packaging I only spli= ced out > > one -- the pigz dependency. >=20 > I have taken your recipe and removed more bundled sources in a snippe= t. > There=E2=80=99s still bundled stuff that we should get rid of, most i= mportantly > kmc, which brings its own executables. >=20 > I also changed the description based on the paper; instead of patchin= g > the Makefile I overwrite the make flags. >=20 > Attached is a patch. Does this work for you? > What do others think about this patch? >=20 > ~~ Ricardo