From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id qOfuISpTzmXLQwEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:08:42 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id qOfuISpTzmXLQwEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:08:42 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=landt.email header.s=MBO0001 header.b=N4++tQkO; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=landt.email; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1708020522; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=7w6MkDOj5k0MSpvPKIzwlzWEmQIXtQH7xTNNga7tflU=; b=CpS7MtEhKb9AUpgiy2WRxjlYIrg4JW/RCYM7eQz/TMyRdMMAmk7ITEs0A3fAuEN/xW69kW qtO2UKyKVIMbAfePZgZjN7lzBJ7TtgzSLXkrmL3P0RMQwNtM8u7C2G07AMZSdS1kK4tuGo VMRNB6vYmXdnh0H3osNV2oBm1dM642W05rZ85cf0cBRNDAxMvNDdvudksIdF+cHb+QVls/ fhmHyMdJih3w0lLgXpqhl6KBpHhjxXwiHIfy7vIC3mhLoF3FQLXyW8vqtJVpRsxfb/ubqK B3KNXiVQnxO5aCzQ7+CVKWC5Hndph1nWYCuAGbnGUSewpWNZPZI6+WuQ5KIceA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=landt.email header.s=MBO0001 header.b=N4++tQkO; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=landt.email; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1708020522; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=XMh+0TZlzfBmnXn+rqRq6uP1EBv1da1qtIduYJF2ID/HelkhOt1eoiHUDVvHdHUaijd52W DYmlpphq9ecE9rUOpoejx2WSGAzjF/F8U9zDILDLUXhv9ONBMzQkMY9bi+aBs0s9UIGpB5 ivlk/XdMtI4ewyHOBFQAjPMvVMVp3rkdgDokJhCGIo+4IQikL6ZkwBv5ni9KwyI0PzX3zp 0dhwjX1pplbB1EvfXb69lMRJ/ef7HtinU44y9bwUi95RsYsjAjV6ldfWndlwEBf1yVFqCe wtU586U2AQnoRlIyqZv3t6wqOFGjfkbgQ9JlNn7TJjFOH03hUeS0w9swQKnMeA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4998E168FF for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:08:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rag9N-0004mQ-BF; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:07:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rag9L-0004aT-TE for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:07:56 -0500 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.171]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rag9J-0004Kq-BI for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:07:55 -0500 Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TbNMS3P4Jz9scX; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:07:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=landt.email; s=MBO0001; t=1708020468; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7w6MkDOj5k0MSpvPKIzwlzWEmQIXtQH7xTNNga7tflU=; b=N4++tQkOzDb9og/DfeGZMZAMIXosjmFwaFRRb/GPM+GyzNxjT9TONdjfp1jAxeVAYp9nxF 0FgAV3HpdxZYOQs4dO1Jwb0RdbHrGBhJJDwxue5rXRhAsW6FpRXVZrVHWkd7hhUx5M4EFI mR9rRdStA11iUPvFGzumrbjWH4j6uP2jaBNvTLPqNVN1yhwD94A3ZKoHQqiHsZ4efe+1YN Ye4Nfnw/muiyxr0wdnyI4c/Z+79QNNKUUAvgrFCTe9c2hXf3lna6LyOADPdL5/dYCqUbq1 khoqH4+olqzostsh3lT0C/3uNLTOMpAK4nHDRoX21zcIGTQqthACnTtaZdO7wA== Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:07:47 +0100 (CET) From: Nils Landt To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Message-ID: <2090924799.195043.1708020467923@office.mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: References: <651390050.176762.1708008171345@office.mailbox.org> Subject: Re: How to debug a failed build of rust application under cargo-build-system? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.241.56.171; envelope-from=nils@landt.email; helo=mout-p-201.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.63 X-Spam-Score: -6.63 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4998E168FF X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-TUID: hokvp6cDty+c > Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> hat am 15.02.2024 17:23 CET geschrieben: > > Oh... Right, so I managed to track down the difference. The importer uses > async-stream in 0.3.2 while cargo in 0.3.5. After updating the packaged version > to 0.3.5, it now compiles, so that is nice. > > Wait, it is not. I assumed that rust is big on the semver. Should 0.3.2 and > 0.3.5 be the same (except bug fixes)? :-O This was in fact a bug fix in 0.3.3: https://github.com/tokio-rs/async-stream/blob/master/async-stream/CHANGELOG.md#033 I have been bitten by Guix's "let's disregard patch versions unless it's version 0.0.x" style a few times now. > But thanks to you I managed to solve this, so thanks :) Happy to hear you solved it!