From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms1.migadu.com with LMTPS id uFvIFGksEGZ+SgEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:52:57 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id uFvIFGksEGZ+SgEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:52:57 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=interia.pl header.s=dk header.b=ABZe+9fg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=interia.pl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1712335977; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=N8bKVavKCR8WCV3iHYVZy3ULPkJ2jRAxE4qFgmC0B4+EglRVMCYYK5SaO0QCRwW2XW83Zv mnxYc9uGgn6gX2TkKPerejLRZtl9Ra2yvQlo60EUrkuNFV1vceUKUDkzlNfDnNTFNH6xPm tcFgIHQShhi/epBdnfZGGq38dDquSF4639D0Gr3Hzn0fgMTJRkIdrMHrzZdUh92DhEH1DP 4PWgSA7kONRu61RCmGYZBWpkyUfMjQvhiPW2yjh2CWwV5VAgAsQkRvVtvs5Xr/cnaQEIsq t0aZES3RCAZqerFSp5UYH03PxHxBwqh7xW8m2c0Fu07Sl/bk6xT1DTIz6n/G1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=interia.pl header.s=dk header.b=ABZe+9fg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=interia.pl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1712335977; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=9ED565wGD/eATBgeiNQQkjez+t2XfbtGrX/tQyPbPRY=; b=j5rjF1CdvscxsCO4nFV5fhFiLZQGMVdrvJcBGObqZ6Te8vImbHgEkPs1dwf5OffUe5Xp2U XJ/RNHjyQRDEZEK85N4AZpNqhfAVFfgBmC6JcPPf/ky0yI33sr//apWRWmU8U+H90P0yUv xGi8QC2k/qvLlgOPl/9wJqnaSZY3noXnL7PolrIvwU4ENC+qhsP/EXbjRlzGzipszroyws oc+0gsTpck3S/iH/6e0YENT9JPYl26YpBrv1ZcJcAtyHIVIe1DzBCOqP6NGaE/llJ3Y0WV FxuUNJVaCATm73biLvoen/071Rm5NNCK1OtFB0fQI0yQS7drH8pehgM27GBh6Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DD5E7B538 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:52:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rsmna-0003bP-Di; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:52:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rsmnY-0003Zp-P6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:52:17 -0400 Received: from smtpo69.interia.pl ([217.74.67.69]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rsmnV-00008j-HZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:52:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (89-64-56-150.dynamic.chello.pl [89.64.56.150]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:52:06 +0200 From: Jan Wielkiewicz To: Giovanni Biscuolo Cc: Guix Devel , guix-security@gnu.org, Felix Lechner , Ryan Prior Subject: Re: backdoor injection via release tarballs combined with binary artifacts (was Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils) Message-ID: <20240405185206.7618b456@interia.pl> In-Reply-To: <8734s1mn5p.fsf@xelera.eu> References: <87ttkon4c4.fsf@protonmail.com> <8734s1mn5p.fsf@xelera.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IPL-Priority-Group: 0-0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=dk; t=1712335927; bh=9ED565wGD/eATBgeiNQQkjez+t2XfbtGrX/tQyPbPRY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ABZe+9fgEuPptDhhk847oYdiya9s7KP7hHXF/wagkGG6BzMx0ZQvbVbxbqYxJ1ALK oC0s+zI8mUM7jzej5MobZELfq0lKlnaeHx3CgD5L00U0QsnoInGbiG5TNT2uVnnTsq OBdFqzhi9TisoAQ6VBjFh0nQROPn0h48G4rZsT+8= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.74.67.69; envelope-from=tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl; helo=smtpo69.interia.pl X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Spam-Score: -8.79 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2DD5E7B538 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.79 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: D/+iV5+SGGPC On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:34:42 +0200 Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I know for sure that Guix maintainers and developers are working on > this, I'm just asking to find some time to inform and possibly discuss > with users (also in guix-devel) on what measures GNU Guix - the > software distribution - can/should deploy to try to avoid this kind > of attacks. What about integrating ClamAV into the build farms (if this isn't a thing already)? ClamAV could scan source files and freshly-built packages and perhaps detect obvious malware. AFAIK it can also detect CVEs. Guix already has ClamAV packaged so this shouldn't be that hard. -- Jan Wielkiewicz