From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id sOr5EJ09DmSWoAAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 22:01:17 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0K/7EJ09DmRFWgEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 22:01:17 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D538E3658D for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 22:01:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbSoS-0007J8-MC; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:01:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbSoQ-0007Iu-Jx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:01:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbSoQ-00063T-9e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:01:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pbSoQ-0001b4-4q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#62071: openjdk@9/10 sources not reproducible Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 21:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62071 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars-Dominik Braun Cc: 62071@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 62071-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62071.16786548266090 (code B ref 62071); Sun, 12 Mar 2023 21:01:02 +0000 Received: (at 62071) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2023 21:00:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pbSnq-0001aA-Dg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:00:26 -0400 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:43806 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pbSnn-0001a0-EN for 62071@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:00:25 -0400 Received: from tangletp (p57b52a32.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.181.42.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AB783F954; Sun, 12 Mar 2023 22:00:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 22:00:21 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Message-ID: <20230312220021.22bfff4f@tangletp> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.0.0 (GTK+ 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/xfzUt4E6HAV9YPnMWOGBbWv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1678654876; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Ho6yyPKHECZySl9F6wbKFKmQNXo9F++HZEmZWTS1zIpmxpjfxxOEbPttWzGMHZWnmb/LSu f4BbktWwUWlbk6G8uvpQoe4swzsDREzYY3XL0EjEeNthJPWjwSs/neKrwe7kSGtebMvCAy xb/nD3R6MhvIxtN2vJ+nACrA42uiNDAee1uEWniX4DhF0M5YqTqCs9MZVgu9DjLu0miFR4 dscP1LbHid6RIsFSIGqV79MvcIVIND9ODrMHOqmvglIwHXlv3uOu//5ywd5V6QDttBh0n5 VfZQ6sEM2l4jvU9hu/+eOAW0CAnHZBztlOZf/Vw6u/zRlK3dt7yivnOYpoqGbQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1678654876; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=FB2gaC46RT2YV0Hoquwe9Nkst6oIXEuQndOWfoF5z7w=; b=FDph549UiixZC9XklyG7G1Zbku+ri5eFeambYbTPlurc9jjH7FxiobXk1yUvH0z2XXtezJ uxONyIKf1CVUJTXnZkB3LCrxCWLZ85fR1tpHO6tHVf9LJYB81RQcpMnBUCeBRZempUatr2 yp5PaRqD6Cg2YigyMLvNctMIBD4VL/+OE1s5lxCuseazrhfGjWrTfYCxXvqb6IjppCBaii m/UrD9ixihh3w9V45wor6SE4HkCy6ydSXgPleg/SDDMjVWUrWAhWNc9jyA80yIavOBKshS Qn7bbB9pd/PDbcm0UcFhK700TG4nH0M/UOgy8ztn4wz4jBrW+4Odvo5c4I6rTA== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.81 X-Spam-Score: -4.81 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D538E3658D X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none X-TUID: 9ug3qCgLfies --Sig_/xfzUt4E6HAV9YPnMWOGBbWv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:48:53 +0100 Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > Hi, >=20 > it looks like the (auto-generated) tarballs for openjdk@9 and > openjdk@10 changed their hash, causing a hash mismatch via >=20 > guix build -S openjdk@9 --no-substitutes --no-grafts >=20 > I=E2=80=99m not sure why it uses these tarballs in the first place, since= we > have a hg-download. I compared for JDK9 the two tarballs (old and new hash) and there is no difference in the content (according to diffoscope). Also, if I hg-clone the repository/tag (and add the .hg_archival.txt file), all three directory trees have the same hash value according to guix hash -rx Thus, it seams like their artifacts are not stable, as we saw it for autogenerated artifacts on github. I will check the same for JDK10 and will prepare a patch within the next two days. Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/xfzUt4E6HAV9YPnMWOGBbWv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EAREKAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCZA49ZQAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /ZPVAJwJBM3IhJAHQObQZUJlxg949Gd1TACeNDPnn+F00mB5ADw9uZ8bmWX9L9g= =+1IK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xfzUt4E6HAV9YPnMWOGBbWv--