Sorry for the late response, I was a little busy to apply the suggested changes. On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:32:38 +0200 Maxime Devos wrote: >The VM thing sounds like a good system test, add it to gnu/tests/ so >we can verify it and avoid breaking things with future changes. I implemented the `gnu/tests/bootloader.scm` tests related to the changes we are proposing. also about other remarks you mentioned me directly, I applied them on my recent patch. > Can FDTDIR be set automatically or unset automatically depending on > the hardware? That would reduce the required configuration No, that's not possible. As I mentioned in the initial message, some hardware may or may not require it depending on the kernel. On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:27:19 +0200 Mathieu Othacehe wrote: >The bootloader record is supposed to be bootloader agnostic. This >fdtdir naming thing seems to be extlinux specific. > >Should we maybe rename this field "device-tree-support?" in the recent patch I renamed the `ignore-fdtdir?` parameter to the `device-tree-support?` Regards, Reza -- Reza Alizadeh Majd PantherX Team https://pantherx.org