From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id eKGQHjOc3GKSFQAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 03:11:15 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id MOr0HTOc3GLqAAEAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 03:11:15 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06819E8E5 for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 03:11:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51370 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oFQ9J-0003Wz-Ky for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 21:11:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oFQ99-0003Wp-2P for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 21:11:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oFQ98-000375-OD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 21:11:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oFQ98-00025W-HG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 21:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54691: [PATCH 2/5] gnu: Add fortunes-jkirchartz. Resent-From: bokr@bokr.com Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 01:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54691 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Liliana Marie Prikler Cc: 54691@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxime Devos Received: via spool by 54691-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54691.16586250057914 (code B ref 54691); Sun, 24 Jul 2022 01:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 54691) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2022 01:10:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46580 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oFQ8C-00023Z-NG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 21:10:05 -0400 Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.200.34]:39764) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oFQ88-00022u-NU for 54691@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2022 21:10:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0EAE2E24; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 01:09:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1658624993; bh=PrIBbvJVOo1KpJiqXN05cK01XV0PdRZJ/XEYvTsq+48=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Hq8vkyy6TVg9uaSCspxkJSNABxFsUIIiJN/B1DlBabXmcSKrsKrUoyiLHVhWf2ZjF oJW7nfJYNnshaqQxOFrcX40JuAUGt+I866fpmrUVOE90gvQ3Czddi3K4nq2DOaLsnB J2AhOnEIWAduqCM82AW/ToV0j2jmB7y0IaPTnARZObhLc5Fu8pdSqzVnj/wFKZ8Dud XSwaRJGAfDp3Xh4opB7wsQfMCCh2txBLm99GjTkMGoFCaHRDAt9LBcA0EzIZdkBDod N+EF0GKUwousabrBLr7vqA+Y+o+vVXkOOa5hvgAhEHC9AK/IhZwZtw4dzfRgmpFR+D s4HzZ+1gsCTow== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at emo08-pco.easydns.vpn Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (emo08-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPa9YVc8tgRO; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 01:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (m90-129-205-38.cust.tele2.se [90.129.205.38]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47437E2DAF; Sun, 24 Jul 2022 01:09:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1658624992; bh=PrIBbvJVOo1KpJiqXN05cK01XV0PdRZJ/XEYvTsq+48=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=S01ZAzkxBaR+UUfVh0rZgNF9zgeTRB8JWdG1PBR1Wzl9lc1tnPb6jn0p50nHNyKGQ DaAg3x3FHxMe/lniSdMDPpNmgTyfh1iUqkdcEZLS9G7QUCv5zUVhAVdAr6s3WzYotX c5n7Pu2OgFVp1Jn7KzjiwmZjoabBmh3UtUICUB2K7m0rWWNKGsYWKRCSfQZZF2bNon DhJRCvxjUME8GnUU83WYvpA4NFWr08vwlVsHIjlS+3ZQ8jfGeKGgr9TP48597fTHrm YCY3JEveo/rZpHngTr93n1dM6yO8ZrY+STGqkN07RS5vh2vHPu1X3Zrw4mmmTYsTMa MloHR3wHiL25A== From: bokr@bokr.com Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 03:09:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20220724010939.GA4249@LionPure> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1658625075; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=sDCvRnjdEtldPHRWfJm0B65kDYpbZi512MOwoKXDQ5w=; b=Oqi79nqPRsooMsrXEYRV0PaEG9OJcpv3pFZEUKRXI5X0FnvbGzY5GfYXzG0Thxa/AfG4aD 7sparayqFSrC5BiJzt2YDwEXHixeUl5S/usLYr/7uBDIJT0kbztUwMtMAqbNm+r3TZAYOP YCHa7L7YVJ8Rra37QbbyO4VPGHSSosDlicn+ARh160Y68rYjmuwvZRZCxkT9LNPJtvXLq4 YbzbUqPnfNt60hMZB+aoVPrbalAEQviX/JJVGJALqEvwHf890NY1ervQiKC4xvBUAMgksl p4k+1oF4SdIQG+vv5+GMOuxwarENvG4VWxUVforEDKUmrxGCjhV7VfR1YmZcEg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1658625075; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=l0QBu8NRHOekRwUQ3Mwp3GE9CkxE8msIB7VapCTu5PvEJsScBjvVZ2wVMSsnR4KFZndczj jbtBwAZ8bp/GRd5ETQcachWsBpev1BA1rAWo33PMvgfAV22AmV7SvzjET79Ud7dgND4QCw KjVX2l2qvS58SeGqcwKHpE0eLh5FHEZ8vVL6wmR80Ms+JZ9PfpjOid3RUDyQNFaC5aIBU9 oz4lKq8mqWnAnAzwKcdXvIuJVlxrPU3TT2ZrnQb8dxo6k0srVRU3qLm4UjUhpb0+9+UGJn iVJm42+b15v2+5ACE4PQg7Pv7l1v2850N/dMwblW3DVQwT/1TGv42njzPU9GyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=Hq8vkyy6; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=S01ZAzkx; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.03 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=Hq8vkyy6; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=S01ZAzkx; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 06819E8E5 X-Spam-Score: -0.03 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: PVy+w4DpaEe9 Hi, On +2022-07-23 22:53:59 +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Am Samstag, dem 23.07.2022 um 21:56 +0200 schrieb Maxime Devos: > > On 23-07-2022 17:11, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > > > > > +        (revision "2022.05.23"))        ; Use a date rather than a > > > number > > > > This is a technically a possibility, but currently the convention is > > to use numbers and the number convention is expected by (guix > > upstream) and the (not yet merged, needs some finishing touches IIRC) > > latest-git updater, and AFAIK there hasn't been any discussion on > > switching to dates. > In this case I am departing from the usual convention because I think > calendar versioning is more useful for this type of content. Given the > issue that lead to this patch at all, I'm not sure if support for > automatic updates would be a good idea with this package. IMHO, it's a > feature rather than a bug that you can't accidentally pull a third of > BSD's offensive database, were it to ever land in this repo. > > Should I explain this thought more clearly in the package or do > automatic updates trump ethical concerns? > > > I like the YYYY.MM.DD format to tag data with a version cookie, but I sometimes (not often) wind up with more than one version in a day, so I like to allow at least an optional single lower case [a-z] suffix, e.g., (revision "2022.05.23b") just 2¢ :) -- Regards, Bengt Richter