From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id IO1vMuFhwWKMTAEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 11:31:13 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id yP4pMuFhwWLz6AAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 11:31:13 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40477EA76 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 11:31:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49352 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7vwd-00083z-61 for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 05:31:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7v3K-0006t5-Ho for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 04:34:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o7v3K-0007hK-1I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 04:34:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7v3J-0005bv-OR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 04:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#56353: sbcl-2.2.6 build fail Resent-From: bokr@bokr.com Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2022 08:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56353 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher Baines Cc: Guillaume Le Vaillant , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 56353@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 56353-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56353.165683722921549 (code B ref 56353); Sun, 03 Jul 2022 08:34:01 +0000 Received: (at 56353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2022 08:33:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43254 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7v36-0005bU-PR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 04:33:49 -0400 Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([64.68.200.34]:37494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o7v32-0005bE-MW for 56353@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2022 04:33:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71676223F; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1656837218; bh=iny2V9/4RqtuvfJdARfYz2vrI4ldCD1uuqDksbWVkLA=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W02RIwfDjNbAC93CulVUcQAzWgtFDglaububMFJ4q0JqrgoVGSGjmbeczQOCTZDeA 7YmbqAX7FDOr0ATD12Llve6PAi7i0EUe+SPy24SybCH48kf/dsEXpoDRllFY9cow0z BeCZ0Tndxukp/xjPkc9kWtiHMjAVVL4xWq+UFtTFcs/Udjg7iP2k7B4W+TKaABfGjI 1SxSCadj43dGPtiF7AIRVp3i84vfLNtD2aepTDoNu/G6rdLPE0gj5X0+sbPWd7ZHwL +B6gJWNRjt90mmKz1ZSZ5q8MkVMsH0DuXJqQgJtGTjoGu620kPFInL5qEHIdnUzMsb 994UmoiIbkViQ== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at emo09-pco.easydns.vpn Received: from mailout.easymail.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (emo09-pco.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c5GH8XZ8ctDt; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (m83-185-45-117.cust.tele2.se [83.185.45.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailout.easymail.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D890621E4; Sun, 3 Jul 2022 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=bokr.com; s=easymail; t=1656837218; bh=iny2V9/4RqtuvfJdARfYz2vrI4ldCD1uuqDksbWVkLA=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=W02RIwfDjNbAC93CulVUcQAzWgtFDglaububMFJ4q0JqrgoVGSGjmbeczQOCTZDeA 7YmbqAX7FDOr0ATD12Llve6PAi7i0EUe+SPy24SybCH48kf/dsEXpoDRllFY9cow0z BeCZ0Tndxukp/xjPkc9kWtiHMjAVVL4xWq+UFtTFcs/Udjg7iP2k7B4W+TKaABfGjI 1SxSCadj43dGPtiF7AIRVp3i84vfLNtD2aepTDoNu/G6rdLPE0gj5X0+sbPWd7ZHwL +B6gJWNRjt90mmKz1ZSZ5q8MkVMsH0DuXJqQgJtGTjoGu620kPFInL5qEHIdnUzMsb 994UmoiIbkViQ== From: bokr@bokr.com Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2022 10:33:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20220703083325.GA40670@LionPure> References: <6B9D52CF-992E-402B-9ABA-4E017804B4A6@tobias.gr> <87ilof78y0.fsf@cbaines.net> <87o7y74eid.fsf@kitej> <87edz36zm5.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87edz36zm5.fsf@cbaines.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1656840673; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=wOpxmHz4lAxhV5oibVGFh04T+jHMMMdT5wgmoOqt7sU=; b=ByPaS/rXPWiWtnJTvowtNL1AUh70b+ZSo+vrUZHvn2kp7CZaJmFqeIE7QvdCCSIM6G0KQt 7YLUpkiJM2jCcPUVg7vrOOFahm2uNlZ4fqA/w9jWjscY6fax/dnxm2Nx+s4QtJ7Z8xhjNc tWGGSRvtsfyopZo5Ycilr8RqoEzj2JQxwYHH+brMFblS2bXy5qHoKdvKjcqDZ7hV/MZ4le U4N0LIaPjfqusNvdjseXWMD+aaDRICREVb2a5h1ycCe5vrsaLT68vpWUnZQMuYhBqFyFDW CvJY+W1EPwdTn9lR/oyRxs5ywQmNl8/KsfBrnSUrmlD06KgUFGqdJpUuAXpO1w== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1656840673; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rnvmNRByyL13GXGGQO9d1ZKQsJ5b9nLkhLx+LnqhCQNR8RgXrwkXHN6Da3sZBiswEjYCxi zTVD/n2sshOu9hQJ+xlHVq+xltKj1lkoxgCx6EUxV3aw+d41W1k+lDeK1z0GccHJ3PPMlX 6Gc6rI6sphfDxFfsTyaUJN6z/z4Wp99oSGVu3jPvH/6YqsQwBCehfIKW+8GCyQCH6rnTF/ eGVVeZJKr0FHhgpEeJYwzFZOfcj7Y7mZHrP6Ssqj9IpUdI7rl40w/fMkNJObHjU6uimEgn YJPgfR/lV5CIOcRygBZfRRdRms3bbL6LkOJjL9YZeGxv2zaBN0QfsK5WIxpQyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=W02RIwfD; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=W02RIwfD; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.75 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=W02RIwfD; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=bokr.com header.s=easymail header.b=W02RIwfD; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 40477EA76 X-Spam-Score: 0.75 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 3PeCvB0B7/h0 Hi, On +2022-07-02 20:26:40 +0100, Christopher Baines wrote: > > Guillaume Le Vaillant writes: > > > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > > Christopher Baines skribis: > > > >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > >> > >>> On 2 July 2022 09:29:22 UTC, Wensheng Xie wrote: > >>>>Das Erstellungsprotokoll kann unter „/var/log/guix/drvs/6l/q7dfdfzrlp24lmhj95fcnvkr2mrqfz-sbcl-2.2.6.drv.bz2“ eingesehen werden. > >>> > >>> > >>> This log file is always a good idea to include. > >> > >> I think this is the equivalent non-grafted derivation: > >> > >> https://data.guix.gnu.org/gnu/store/m7xw777v5agldb76gbqkqdvrrlj5d7zy-sbcl-2.2.6.drv > >> > >> There are plenty of failed builds on bordeaux.guix.gnu.org. I managed to > >> get it to build successfully once though on my laptop. > >> > >> Guillaume, any ideas if sbcl@2.2.6 is just really unlikely to build > >> successfully, or if there's particular conditions for it to build? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Chris > > > > According to the logs, the 'build-doc' phase fails to compile the > > documentation for SIMD related functions. There's a patch disabling this > > part of the doc unless we compile on x86_64, but maybe not all x86_64 > > CPUs have the required instructions... > > > > Would it be possible to get the result of "lscpu" on some machines where > > it fails? > > Sure, here is the lscpu output from the bayfront and harbourfront > machines. > [...] I wonder what running this at the time builds failed would have shown: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- #/usr/bin/bash # ~/bin/top-1-sans-hilights -- single snap of top without highlight escapes (no top opt for that??) top -n 1 | \ sed -e 's:[\r][^\r]*[\r]\+::g' -e 's:[\x07\r]::g' -e 's:.\x08::g' \ -e 's:\x1B\[[^a-zA-Z]*[a-zA-Z]\x0f*::g' \ -e 's:\xe2\x80\x98:":g' -e 's:\xe2\x80\x99:":g' --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- (no guarantees on my hack to get rid of the highlighting escapes and utf8->ascii quote subst :) (top seems to assume even -n 1 output is always going to interactive dest) Anyway, wondering: Could memory and CPU loading at the time have triggered the build failure? -- Regards, Bengt Richter