From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id OO2mBj++VGLKGQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 01:48:15 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id OOVmAz++VGI9DwAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 01:48:15 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9CFF06A for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 01:48:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52710 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ne3lV-0001ju-E6 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:48:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ne3lK-0001jj-I6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:48:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ne3lK-0002nT-4Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:48:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ne3lK-0000pz-0E for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#54864: GNU Cuirass reports arm64 as armhf Resent-From: Bengt Richter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 23:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54864 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christopher Rodriguez Received: via spool by 54864-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54864.16497208683160 (code B ref 54864); Mon, 11 Apr 2022 23:48:01 +0000 Received: (at 54864) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2022 23:47:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46423 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ne3l6-0000oq-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:47:48 -0400 Received: from mail151c40.carrierzone.com ([209.235.151.151]:37196) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ne3l3-0000oO-8b for 54864@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 19:47:46 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: bokr@oz.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=carrierzone.com; s=mailmia; t=1649720864; bh=n1o/GTqZYQhp7Y4A5OqUoZ95sgQWwGZ1L/Bgd4kKZ2o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jZ4YpPh0vkTZwhfZXFkEA6WUJtS1/Ym4fHrmC17A4gX6m/9Kv/SUe2tMaryFWU90F UXSz9kses34UPHbYwwyv/rET8QK0wKPuoBvWYBhfuXkmxPB7/NOrWmwKM5PlJIuA5D ivlSV6sOF1HlCKd1zNMLzDKgxI0t52mpyajv2RcU= Feedback-ID: bokr@oz.net Received: from localhost (m90-129-205-85.cust.tele2.se [90.129.205.85]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail151c40.carrierzone.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 23BNlej1000361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Apr 2022 23:47:43 +0000 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 01:47:25 +0200 From: Bengt Richter Message-ID: <20220411234725.GA7517@LionPure> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F29.6254BE20.0021, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-Origin-Country: SE X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bengt Richter Cc: 54864@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1649720894; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=a3Ub17uWR9XF/5qUnAtI8S+qNpNeavOIhnkpob7nt5o=; b=eV2V6VELW5lUY+5x5C3jICR5c6+5X4+K/NpPbbbciC1Fz5Smd+gcICckHYZvvmcvd2aXc/ Ulobh76xlPB/C9YGlm8szqRVRRSdE0SzbfNwJOstOvtmAKKhYxJC4678aNCQ2JN63sxaFI HK+PkfE9dTmOHwnxrGPCBU9ss4Q7/aBiUXD3wnEjKj1nOAliAwA855P4wVNGHfFVXAPALT q8/ulYZqhqM7HlFEoyk9dgGPoYk7s6GxmMgaTgp/kdPbeag+d4TZLKUaa31v5GwNh5BOhK amWrBQS4FnpPFnqVP69OTxXyd6vjccgQOBhqSIXjFqr+rV9+Apgf0tAHf7hhGw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1649720894; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ep9mxb9qtUu4bw9RQKW+eN9lUCd1sDhpkqGvSKW2q7EmkvFeOefcFU5DL+SWmH5J7LYkvt 6l5l+hebPoJWcD+9pY3QN49XKXWW58N+iXxG+B2YoiATW5ipmo38n1eiqB0qjoDtcf24fX jYFU3tN1EpjjCsn/uzhKlN7GLcFP3kbvHVPqUUsZN02MkUC0LW6Mg3PSF37hR1LoJNs3se wYcY0ru43Rwlrsl7YkgRbsc60UubW/FDBpRZdBFUDPDbPx3sy9Q6F/rsen+akQxjmpkOLv CtuAwFpmxkGi3wk9OEJ2o82NmeNyzD1RWh5NtfPF2RieDb2i/lQ0EaSMfEbZCw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=carrierzone.com header.s=mailmia header.b=jZ4YpPh0; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.93 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=carrierzone.com header.s=mailmia header.b=jZ4YpPh0; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4C9CFF06A X-Spam-Score: 2.93 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: O7s/xfiFDb11 Hi Christopher, Tl;dr: [Meta-Reply] I think IWBN if a busy volunteer like yourself could add a cookie in an email like yours that would automatically provide a "heads-up" to readers of the documentation you intend to patch. The idea is that emails could be automatically scanned for such cookies/markup, e.g. maybe "[Pending-Patch]", next to an URL for the doc in question, which URL could then simply be appended to a log file of such urls, (maybe together with date and author from the email header). People could manually grep it if reading a document that is confusing, to check if an update is on the way, for starters. But if it's a good idea, then I would hope document reading tools would start to make automatic use of it, maybe starting with a notice like "Heads Up: [Pending-Patch]" when opening the doc or section of the doc. It could grow features as people came up with new and better ideas, but I think there are developers here that could prototype something useful in an evening :) Thus, given that you took the time to write your email, it would not have been much extra trouble adding the cookie so your text below would look like e.g., ([Pending-Patch] https://guix.gnu.org/cuirass/manual/cuirass.html#Specifications) (IIUC that's the doc you intend to patch) :) HTH in some way. Better ideas? I don't mind :) On +2022-04-11 17:55:41 -0400, Christopher Rodriguez wrote: > Reporting this from my local installs of GNU Cuirass, though a cursory glance at > ci.guix.gnu.org (likely) shows the same issue: > > GNU Cuirass currently reports both `armhf-linux` and `arm64-linux` targets as > `armhf-linux` on the web interface. > > This is not only incorrect, but potentially confusing to newcomers: I have spent > some free time in the last week or two (after purchasing an MNT Reform) trying > to get my home server to build packages for deployment on an ARM-based laptop. I > only discovered that I was targeting the 32-bit version of ARM after asking on > IRC (and then looking through the logs: > https://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2022-04-11.log#221203 or thereabouts, where > vagrantc mentions `armhf` as suffering bitrot and goes on to mention both > `aarch64` and `arm64` in another sentence). > > This is not helped by the Documentation > (https://guix.gnu.org/cuirass/manual/cuirass.html#Specifications) not giving any > examples of supported platforms, highly-search-engine-ranked issues and blog > posts (https://issues.guix.gnu.org/54055 and > https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2021/cuirass-10-released/ for instance, both > front-page google) only mentioning `armhf-linux`, and all running instances of > GNU Cuirass not even listing `arm64-linux` as an option. > > When I have time (I am out of town for the rest of the week) I will try to > submit a patch for the documentation to list the available targets. Changing the > UI is more complex (though wider-reaching) and a bit more out of my > wheelhouse. Help there would be appreciated. > > -- > > Christopher Rodriguez -- Regards, Bengt Richter