From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id qBCNClcqnmF3qQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:04:39 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id IMBGBlcqnmGubQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 12:04:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEE5B209C6 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:04:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45810 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpr0v-00030C-BH for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:04:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpqzw-0002H8-Dv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:03:36 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:55910 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mpqzs-0001eV-Tp; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 07:03:36 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CEDD3606B4; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:03:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1637755409; bh=qjVgCzpX37z1DoXwOqGYVcSVhXgRAN5XQ3c5wAstarY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=bV/JaBm8398CvVbx5ghCImpEkx9aZh/edX0HM7ch/ufmeV9iayllVn+/CLHU8YWr+ IcEMVnIBDXUaZBC0wpOLEUPc3g0CfvpwoiDZr0+L6r4Z31GuIZWt+oUmmvkjXrUW+l 9NSyJxefRri8luYJOiEsDl9FBfAFn8UcviZxbTVQ= Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:03:18 +0100 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Subject: Re: ZFS part of Guix? RFC? (Re: Effectively force all GNOME users to locally compile ZFS?) Message-ID: <20211124120136.l2dmta332z7c6bmx@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <87eecfrw25.fsf@nckx> <20211120020940.5efaa2b2@primary_laptop> <87v90no8n1.fsf@nckx> <20211121023324.0a3ba29a@primarylaptop.localdomain> <20211121103548.yi5lo6ymcnm22gfm@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20211122180255.ipauqebmoiyw4bb3@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87bl2aixvx.fsf@gnu.org> <20211124005004.109ef096@primarylaptop.localdomain> <20211124014519.1e227941@primarylaptop.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20211124014519.1e227941@primarylaptop.localdomain> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.45.111.108; envelope-from=pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de; helo=mail.pelzflorian.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, raid5atemyhomework@protonmail.com, Domagoj Stolfa Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1637755478; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=qjVgCzpX37z1DoXwOqGYVcSVhXgRAN5XQ3c5wAstarY=; b=twuY/ThtSGSWJTjmohEepv2U6H7dFLzv18IAOKif8YhjXUgspA0pE8iqYovNI1AIoiHcnR M5IrCgehzjHzqZ7iAWcXAWzAVkgo82mbgTDVVukpV9TpOcrS4yLFCXv27jJ0S8Wk13I8S5 zJeF1y84CCHUjFHcGrpaueFrOhggiaCCq3sTFJkAfqKdqffqkvL5CIADgWXkp2S4Mp0xlw SZPA4HECY2ZlkXzaDwv+beZZrAIUB4Zlhu/YDQXqb8FUYwZfRSCkgyyu5JW0cky+KqVdQw cZ5DiGIwQbJ3OPfq1V8Xgk/bSPJtyHq1LOArgij6oCos3K5Xwrs0u7hEUaYHvA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1637755478; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=W2CTdh095/xnFkZZxrgW3yrR/zjKiEzVXGdgeCKsiTT1UUMfA9cGbgkbIqM5cFSTWcveLi tLxAlNFkkHQzKz7XmlPd4WW8KRgdQbcm6SLRmLoNNxuxdZUTHbf7FKqMr8NSfXUwnBMHqZ /w2T8xX1n2Th1tO0n5TOnt3gL4AseNmZxmi8OABs/YkqyXuZ7iBARqSibPHG0/haGQ9eIt gK9O1oNN/iZZggmQ4hcvcdAaq78m3rn8rXv8AUt7m21rkp3FYf08FbT51Yc3yY04pRWTY1 APNFc+AbZzElJRwB+mbJayMQlxDovYT38BOsCYsCQJnix1UEwOouNXBzw3TDJg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b="bV/JaBm8"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.89 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b="bV/JaBm8"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CEE5B209C6 X-Spam-Score: -1.89 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: GqPIh5mJS8Ge On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:45:19AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > If that's the case then it would also be legal to redistribute binaries > too as long as they are dynamically linked as the linking happens at > runtime. The FSF is unable to have such a position. It seems unrelated to the FSDG, so GNU Guix need not care. Regards, Florian