From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id +N4XDHQlmmG3DgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 11:54:44 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id WG7XB3QlmmFgBQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 10:54:44 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6B62A447 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 11:54:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53014 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mokUc-0006s1-Oo for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 05:54:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mokUT-0006rs-31 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 05:54:33 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:51954 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mokUQ-0004FV-1r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 05:54:32 -0500 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7DDF3606B4; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 11:54:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1637492066; bh=QUkfyoF4mSQ6SqdDNTWy4R8ll/EDkP5JThnXAiKERJM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=G5mC7SXxhtP10YQv4kDRRvpF17MIha7D1r2JROf9d03U4YbsutCiP2n7e2tvH61Ac ER50U/Ixmcd7yI+EilmCO/+a+YxobkA6Z31IxW+7klUi9suwvCLZC+CMMMqjBhFEA5 2KCwvvQDAYzc7gVK2qxpPjasf5TlB+0B/5bETPSc= Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 11:54:15 +0100 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" To: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Subject: ZFS part of Guix? RFC? (Re: Effectively force all GNOME users to locally compile ZFS?) Message-ID: <20211121103548.yi5lo6ymcnm22gfm@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <87r1gfgpjc.fsf@netris.org> <292def7687859350b6f1cd95a8cd385b70bbe830.camel@telenet.be> <87eecfrw25.fsf@nckx> <20211120020940.5efaa2b2@primary_laptop> <87v90no8n1.fsf@nckx> <20211121023324.0a3ba29a@primarylaptop.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20211121023324.0a3ba29a@primarylaptop.localdomain> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.45.111.108; envelope-from=pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de; helo=mail.pelzflorian.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, raid5atemyhomework@protonmail.com, Domagoj Stolfa Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1637492083; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=s3lPW+mDUcKZNsA8tP1fXxYI+st2Cmhwy+h036kW9Ec=; b=f31EpG84U09JqiP63IjKO/RK4V3yayKZDoZVbQQIsBivC1EReojHrTCKm6J0isXWEFbi/B 3eiae5/mY0GrqqtDaUcBnxzNDvXWJZmLET+kdUixslQOlhEoVdJBZLL7AhVqD7+USyaOBf Wr9HifOcS9w6aMA8l1Lrtnqrzp0IuiYCttOzKKG6H23aCbRudj/OQSRBUj22uffGpLUTWF UeWmI5IQc5NtoXEIAsrWpHkp2Eq3ba/xrGEJkygAiNO/So1j2ho3vY9I/mHBC3BFu5M7se XQzV4qGowPOJFfDV5s9Z/bZHyTbN26XFA66tI+DzSnJl+G7LcwK+qCzA0RgvDA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1637492083; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qRYhQ5t1W1sh6iB5FL0lUmJ54LAx8h0JFa/Oq+i5zOxgK62SHNcQS6s0EJFeNIwjl7t2GH nYiSDn018xr1YQfEqiIUxreaUXA1oxnTuic/9+rZcY/V86wUPR8kvjy1Qd3i+/u3ulsz6U U+G+qwNSlaqHXwhv+eLcxN+VbJYdyJIB0HQQ/zOaocTgA1eA0AOciE71Ayt4iSRPCqzFA7 RyzLmgkazMNwDycgagvqOCkpqXFSDCP8qYGqZbZPRo9hwKDkrNHX98dTSmnG8ynvNtYqIn z8OF+wvbcGfqonECsgKx7GALhWm+ThqCKVwDKGLqom+D3eVlYQEYxx6NvLWOWw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b=G5mC7SXx; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.88 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b=G5mC7SXx; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9C6B62A447 X-Spam-Score: -1.88 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: RSgXJJrhatBQ Hello Denis. Thank you for your write-up. raid5atemyhomework wrote patches to add ZFS to Guix . I put them in CC. That there is no decision on ZFS and their patches is bad. Maybe their patches would be for the RFC model to decide? As for Denis’ arguments : IANAL but I would dispute this: On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 02:33:24AM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > If I take individual drivers from Linux which are under the GPLv2 or > the GPLv2 or later, and I combine them in a new combined work on a new > git repository with code under the CDDL license, this is not legal > either. And here too I hope that there is some consensus on that too. If we are talking about source code, the GPLv2 files and the CDDL files are not intertwined into a combined work at all. They are just in the same git repo on the same file-system. However I agree that ZFS is unsafe territory; courts might decide otherwise. Regards, Florian