From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 88fUFaOpomD5AQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 19:36:35 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id oCu/EKOpomBiSQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 17:36:35 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A234276F8 for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 19:36:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lihAQ-0007WI-5z for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:36:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lih9d-0007Lb-Sk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:35:46 -0400 Received: from imta-37.everyone.net ([216.200.145.37]:54934 helo=imta-38.everyone.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lih9b-0005wV-OC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:35:45 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14HHXn8B019699; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:35:35 -0700 X-Eon-Originating-Account: 2Gfv82Bk8x6qOyuKpzfamolbE6fndddK8hQg5Jxt0Us X-Eon-Dm: m0116953.ppops.net Received: by m0116953.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 5a81c39e) id m0116953.60a1d27a.1f3c; Mon, 17 May 2021 10:35:33 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQMHrIJgoqllbhboAQIAAAAE,63d4b8f91b1024222269c061d4397db0 X-Eip: 7ghb8_-5QFqvSfmEpScHlsp3dluCTaBi6SqTZD5D84k Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 19:35:25 +0200 From: Bengt Richter To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: GNU Guix 1.4.0 in September? (was: Re: GNU Guix 1.3.0 released) Message-ID: <20210517173525.GA9279@LionPure> References: <87tun2om0a.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <86lf8dr038.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: e3cWmerUaymxbXzX5EOgdolAo0br8X9X X-Proofpoint-GUID: e3cWmerUaymxbXzX5EOgdolAo0br8X9X X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-17_08:2021-05-17, 2021-05-17 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=861 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1034 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105170121 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.200.145.37; envelope-from=bokr@oz.net; helo=imta-38.everyone.net X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Bengt Richter Cc: Guix Devel , Maxim Cournoyer , zimoun Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1621272995; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=TKIln0kSq5sCaXwt3CzE8NAe29HCuyoWkswFdX8gaUo=; b=Kwor1z+eR7bI6G4+4ekB4asDe02qEMyRPyF6ibCczH2vQVXRPX7ceg6x0yhr4GMdAD5XJt o/jqtpuFIUE/FgSvzCYLXggW3QSnW7IDN1IycKSkACEw0iuA15Ghly/WJR1el/KqnyHtf8 5wJFC6iz3pG6PN3Ky438blYY/tg19plNHtsRFdGsve7jSLklWHHzZ5Y92rIt1T0BjPq5it t4yFGS65isiEP/ygCur+qOD6qqlhGVWtdKOZH9gqtj/Be5xux79RfKOsBg5VlF29/mxOya nsFWcHMUe1inmAWNO74WxTNCykMIi2eGVKjUenikm0XvAoQNjM3kLfDR8FMrGw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1621272995; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=oTIzP1DuT9bYJY64l8nyibnPJ0Wg/w54qUG29iSvrssW8AqliBCt1O24oSobT4iwVWb+QF KAkqIrGsicaH+AkCSt4hrZUzHsE5plpvfnkIL77iwZ781DrAppSVaEqUniEss7YefF5/4u K6wC4eUoCoUu7+aDgG+1QlcLlBz9acwxWwev370SigRxSZqmM6x8Pap/rVVZAdo17B+vsx Eb6Y4j6pJ4faNK/jGvOFdmIU1wTkjUYrXV6ABLdH1sGQDb9fBtY0PtHOVEkMH4R7Zo61Uy sqsnRyV4h3HGXZxsgho6DTrII8SZjNbDFfTLvlabxCvdx/fTgIyje0Ff/y6N+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 1.06 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 0A234276F8 X-Spam-Score: 1.06 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: O69G5DvujvpS Hi all, On +2021-05-17 10:43:36 -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 02:55:39PM +0200, zimoun wrote: > > I remember a plot sent to guix-maintaainers about the number of grafts, > > the core-updates merges and the release dates. I am not sure it is > > really interesting and it is worth to resend it, or maybe dumping the > > Cuirass database to investigate a bit more. Well, my point is the > > core-updates merges and the release dates should be synchronized; say > > target the core-updates for end of September, then the release for > > November. To me, this synchronisation makes senses because it > > constraints the ~6months core-updates cycle and in the same time, the 2 > > releases per year. > > I like this idea. > This sounds like planning activity. Gnome has an app called planner ;-) Would it make sense to discuss a way to put these rc- and other related goals on a gantt chart? Maybe even automate import from mailing list emails marked with e.g. [release-planning] in the subject and one delimited markup region like --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- planner-importable xml here --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Discussion without triggering automated import would just leave "[release-plannng]" out of the Subject: line, or have e.g. [release-discussion] in the Subject: line. Anyway, I thought a nice gantt chart .svg or .png or .pdf might be nice :) Thoughts? -- Regards, Bengt Richter