From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id yM4aITdQOmCGPQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:59:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4EDMHDdQOmCzegAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:59:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC21926277 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:59:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38312 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lG07p-0000KU-Vq for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:59:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lG07b-0000IV-5C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:59:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lG07a-0001UN-T4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:59:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG07a-0000tV-RH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46780: java-snappy: Test failure on ci.guix.gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46780 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: zimoun Received: via spool by 46780-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46780.16144343343414 (code B ref 46780); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:59:02 +0000 Received: (at 46780) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 13:58:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43434 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG07S-0000sz-FW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:58:54 -0500 Received: from m4s11.vlinux.de ([83.151.27.109]:36170 helo=bjoernhoefling.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lG07Q-0000sp-Cj for 46780@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:58:52 -0500 Received: from alma-ubu (pd951f669.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.246.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bjoernhoefling.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4544A3FCE9; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:58:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 14:58:47 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Message-ID: <20210227145847.3c0f5baf@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <864khy1nyt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20210225215245.4e34edcf@alma-ubu.fritz.box> <864khy1nyt.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/Xe+FYzzYeNbQEYv_=5ZW8Tc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46780@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1614434359; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=6NGQnbdVJkwmnjvfNS9o54U9fPGjA6VM9Oog08GBkFA=; b=fasVUKZ5+uANIsFiy0/+d5imKP55L/5yjW7X+ulrGYJxLEAJB5Br4tqieJqx44PtBwvkrS qEqm6ffiUZgxDzAZewIM4MCPKXk3QyArTQY5dSxRbnK8Ew9tmsggud1UemIC5oJSKODPy5 FCP8SwPlVhPruF9w6uznPb+kBBhxetwCxTLfkQ2Z4/3JCUdRVckHq5togXlkMkWci2rE/N UckMnt4OvSq1t1Sh+NsImQNr0dljkhLoRt74Y/LULOaobKGrM7vXxaksCV9tW+9hl9jvbC llo34T7dLiQpE8T+I0W1QdCVxclY0WLcCuzaHEs6lz2x8hyg3u7zac0kEyQEhw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614434359; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=tEEprNZtCo8fISZs0ayIqw/Eu6fhdoHvf/IhURCEQrAs6GfWAZjQQQLQWqfjAAv2sZWq9N bvAANe0XGRUU49I1S2Ro+VisgX3oaSRW8ciWlwuYu6SfxUuodyh8f7FgHJqUWGXKDoLqXX sfii1Q6VUK9LjVDNvRi0XrawkmBKviKn1Vxs/6Qk5P3Y/oB7oyc6APrtnjj27sdTfvx8c1 jv1chjLxXd3nFW9eDWcRjN6i27jVCY3RtybLsebY0wjt8TNBVf1Oykazwi3TCMS3bvZyl8 +vY0v3bU+jFc6wDc4QCKrki192oP1sjoa7EWjc6tlKwyB5OcCSoIRdtNkjTaHw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.47 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: EC21926277 X-Spam-Score: -2.47 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: fE8Nncil57iJ --Sig_/Xe+FYzzYeNbQEYv_=5ZW8Tc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:08:42 +0100 zimoun wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 21:52, Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling > wrote: >=20 > > Then increase the memory used by junit: Edit the build.xml file, > > add a huge "maxmemory" property like this : > > > > =20 > [...] >=20 > > If you look at the test case source code, it tries to allocate about > > 20GB and hopes that this fails. It just does not fail on huge > > machines... =20 >=20 > What about adding a phase just before the test? For example in this > build.xml file fix the max memory to 20G if it is greater. The build.xml is auto-generated by our ant-build-system. So we could add some parameter into it. But I found this too much of an overkill, and working on the ant-build-system would mean this goes into staging (we have too many Java package). Thus, at first I thought the idea with the additional phase wouldn't fit here. But at the second glimpse: The build.xml file definitely already exists before running the tests (even before build). So we could add a phase that substitutestars and adds the maxmemory parameter in the build.xml. Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/Xe+FYzzYeNbQEYv_=5ZW8Tc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EAREKAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCYDpQFwAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /UiIAJsFe5GxP2L/TQrGptQmVzy4/n6iUwCfcZBnrD9fYf8JyDSXX2R4UR3eBMk= =P3j9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Xe+FYzzYeNbQEYv_=5ZW8Tc--