GWL 0.3.0 released

GWL 0.3.0 released

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Hey Guix,

The Guix Workflow Language 0.3.0 has been released.

I forgot to Cc y’all in the release announcement:

   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel/2021-02/msg00000.html

-- 
Ricardo

Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

[Ludovic Courtès]

Heya,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> The Guix Workflow Language 0.3.0 has been released.
>
> I forgot to Cc y’all in the release announcement:
>
>    https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel/2021-02/msg00000.html

Congrats on all the hard work!

If you didn’t follow FOSDEM, don’t miss Ricardo’s talk:

  https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/guix_workflow/

Ludo’.

Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

[Bengt Richter]

On +2021-02-10 22:05:45 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Heya,
> 
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
> 
> > The Guix Workflow Language 0.3.0 has been released.
> >
> > I forgot to Cc y’all in the release announcement:
> >
> >    https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gwl-devel/2021-02/msg00000.html
> 
> Congrats on all the hard work!
> 
> If you didn’t follow FOSDEM, don’t miss Ricardo’s talk:
> 
>   https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/guix_workflow/
> 
> Ludo’.
>
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
gpg --verify gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz.sig
gpg: assuming signed data in 'gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Sat 06 Feb 2021 09:28:59 PM CET
gpg:                using RSA key BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
gpg: Good signature from "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>" [expired]
gpg:                 aka "rekado <rekado@elephly.net>" [expired]
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ gpg: Note: This key has expired! │
└──────────────────────────────────┘
Primary key fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
[17:26 ~/bs]$ wl-paste 
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys 
BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
[17:29 ~/bs]$ echo $(wl-paste )
gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
[17:29 ~/bs]$ gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: 16 signatures not checked due to missing keys
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>" not changed │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:              unchanged: 1
[17:30 ~/bs]$ gpg --verify gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz.sig
gpg: assuming signed data in 'gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Sat 06 Feb 2021 09:28:59 PM CET
gpg:                using RSA key BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
gpg: Good signature from "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>" [expired]
gpg:                 aka "rekado <rekado@elephly.net>" [expired]
┌──────────────────────────────────┐
│ gpg: Note: This key has expired! │
└──────────────────────────────────┘
Primary key fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
[17:30 ~/bs]$ 
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Thought someone might want to know.

-- 
Regards,
Bengt Richter

RE: GWL 0.3.0 released

[Cook, Malcolm]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]


Do we know if a video recording Ricardo’s FOSDEM talk is/will be available?  I don’t (yet?) see it in FOSDEM’s Youtube channel.  Thanks!


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1660 bytes --]

Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

[Leo Famulari]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 07:03:31PM +0000, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
> 
> Do we know if a video recording Ricardo’s FOSDEM talk is/will be available?  I don’t (yet?) see it in FOSDEM’s Youtube channel.  Thanks!

Videos are on the way:

https://twitter.com/bitcynth/status/1358761774577819650

Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Bengt Richter <bokr@bokr.com> writes:

> gpg --verify gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz.sig
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz'
> gpg: Signature made Sat 06 Feb 2021 09:28:59 PM CET
> gpg:                using RSA key BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
> gpg: Good signature from "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>" [expired]
> gpg:                 aka "rekado <rekado@elephly.net>" [expired]
> ┌──────────────────────────────────┐
> │ gpg: Note: This key has expired! │
> └──────────────────────────────────┘

You should get a fresh key from keys.openpgp.org
Its expiry is regularly extended.


Ricardo

Re: GWL 0.3.0 released

[Bengt Richter]

On +2021-02-11 21:37:56 +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> 
> Bengt Richter <bokr@bokr.com> writes:
> 
> > gpg --verify gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz.sig
> > gpg: assuming signed data in 'gwl-0.3.0.tar.gz'
> > gpg: Signature made Sat 06 Feb 2021 09:28:59 PM CET
> > gpg:                using RSA key BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
> > gpg: Good signature from "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>" [expired]
> > gpg:                 aka "rekado <rekado@elephly.net>" [expired]
> > ┌──────────────────────────────────┐
> > │ gpg: Note: This key has expired! │
> > └──────────────────────────────────┘
> 
> You should get a fresh key from keys.openpgp.org
> Its expiry is regularly extended.
>
Thanks for all your Fosdem/guix work first of all, but I expected

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[17:29 ~/bs]$ gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: 16 signatures not checked due to missing keys
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>" not changed │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:              unchanged: 1
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

to give me an updated key, and am left wondering why it didn't :)
It seems I have a wrong default for keyserver:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[22:21 ~/bs]$ gpg --refresh-keys
gpg: refreshing 6 keys from hkp://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: 14 signatures not checked due to missing keys
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>" not changed │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---


Maybe the original advice for getting a key should be extended with the
fresh key advice above (preferably the literal gpg command line, my guess re that boxed below).
This seems to do it:
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ gpg --recv-keys BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC --keyserver keys.openpgp.org │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
(though my first try was "gpg --refresh-keys --keyserver keys.openpgp.org"
which only found you for the keys I have).

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
[22:44 ~/bs]$ gpg --recv-keys BCA689B636553801C3C62150197A5888235FACAC --keyserver keys.openpgp.org
gpg: Note: '--keyserver' is not considered an option
gpg: "--keyserver" not a key ID: skipping
gpg: "keys.openpgp.org" not a key ID: skipping
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: 16 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: key 197A5888235FACAC: "Ricardo Wurmus (Work) <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>" not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:              unchanged: 1
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Now gpg --verify works \o/ :)

> 
> Ricardo
-- 
Regards,
Bengt Richter