From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id yNUcHc7Ny185OgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:13:34 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 6ArRGM7Ny183IwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:13:34 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043FA9404FF for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39636 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klc3o-0006sy-QN for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:13:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klc3f-0006so-Dt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:13:23 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:59858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klc3d-0005og-K2; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:13:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E70D131A; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:13:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4sAbLJaz0ItJ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:13:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from jurong (p200300dd5748a2008174e75357774cfb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:dd:5748:a200:8174:e753:5777:4cfb]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CF725C0; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:13:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:13:11 +0100 From: Andreas Enge To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [support-renew@gandi.net: [GANDI] guixsd.org expires in 60 days] Message-ID: <20201205181311.GA13674@jurong> References: <20201202204709.GB12770@jurong> <87sg8k45gu.fsf@gnu.org> <87tut0w76x.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87tut0w76x.fsf@nckx> Received-SPF: neutral client-ip=2a0c:e300::1; envelope-from=andreas@enge.fr; helo=hera.aquilenet.fr X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.80 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 043FA9404FF X-Spam-Score: -1.80 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: f63Fv371AC17 Hello, On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 05:25:58PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > If cost is a pain point, note that Gandi's current annual renewal price of > ¤19 isn't the lowest around. cost is not the problem; but I like tidying up and getting rid of cruft, and I feel that this old domain is some hassle for not much gain: I need to - pay by credit card; - make a wire transfer from the Guix Europe account to my own account; - add an entry to the Guix Europe ledger and check everything is okay. I was against renewing it already two years ago, but the Solidary Administrative Council of Guix Europe decided by consensus last year to keep it for one more year, and to let it run out later. If you prefer to keep the domain, you should bring it for a discussion and a new vote of the SAC. I am still against renewing it, but if people think we should do it, I can live with a renewal as well. Andreas