From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GNOvCmiwV1/XBgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:25:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id cIaFBmiwV18PWQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:25:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C3E394028F for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 16:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56040 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgQf-0006Dy-PP for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:25:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgQY-0006CN-IT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:25:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgQY-0008OG-9G for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:25:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgQY-0007I7-2j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43274: fdisk fails to build on armhf Resent-From: Andreas Enge Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43274 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 43274@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 43274-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43274.159958228227995 (code B ref 43274); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 43274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Sep 2020 16:24:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56213 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgQE-0007HT-HK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:24:42 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([185.233.100.1]:54590) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgQC-0007HL-Aw for 43274@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:24:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C62DA39; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:24:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at aquilenet.fr Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hera.aquilenet.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92mz1OWyaR-E; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:24:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jurong (unknown [IPv6:2001:910:103f::c08]) by hera.aquilenet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 866FFDA23; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:24:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:24:21 +0200 From: Andreas Enge Message-ID: <20200908162421.GA10312@jurong> References: <20200908111939.GA10965@jurong> <20200908120226.GA14984@jurong> <20200908131203.GA19681@jurong> <20200908154753.GA28320@jurong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200908154753.GA28320@jurong> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.51 X-TUID: To0UNkvJJw+E On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:47:53PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > The next step would be to check newer releases (12 and 13) of genimage. > Has it actually ever been built on the arm architecture? I tried 12 and 13, but already on x86_64 the test FAIL: test/basic-images.test 7 - mke2fs fails. If someone with more experience with the package could have a look, that would be nice. Andreas