From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YOucIZNcKV+lGgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:03:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id eCxrHZNcKV/legAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:03:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8352940366 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 13:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55796 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2wb1-0003bL-QO for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:03:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2was-0003bB-Cq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:03:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2was-0003kJ-3t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:03:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2war-0007yc-To for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42229] [PATCH 8/9] gnu: jami: Fix compilation by providing necessary webchat files. Resent-From: Jan Wielkiewicz Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42229 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com Cc: 42229@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42229-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42229.159654616930645 (code B ref 42229); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 13:03:01 +0000 Received: (at 42229) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2020 13:02:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47214 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2waf-0007yD-Hz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:02:49 -0400 Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.155]:48906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2wab-0007vC-90 for 42229@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:02:48 -0400 X-Interia-R: Interia X-Interia-R-IP: 89.64.43.25 X-Interia-R-Helo: Received: from localhost (89-64-43-25.dynamic.chello.pl [89.64.43.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 15:02:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 15:02:26 +0200 From: Jan Wielkiewicz Message-ID: <20200804150226.7efad1dd@interia.pl> In-Reply-To: <87zh7bdnwm.fsf@hurd.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <20200706155030.1938-1-tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> <20200706155030.1938-8-tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> <87zh7bdnwm.fsf@hurd.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Interia-Antivirus: OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=biztos; t=1596546157; bh=1eCd6KIaRpX4xI+SbeD0Hso/9IMNXaLJjvJ/Bpm0PO4=; h=X-Interia-R:X-Interia-R-IP:X-Interia-R-Helo:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Interia-Antivirus; b=iien5tWD3aFjE/sg1JatcblzKC1IvdKCi/ZEjWNWUX/F/ZM5W9KfIY9C2Tnqdsx2a 7BW5FjJ/exIWD9z3h/Uncw94iuEeDtTHuN/D9oNfwHt/APy+oeeeVxcZlT5UMMQphM jLHBcJd9y8xtwccn/P3YgjlYBTeJV3fVNsgFeogU= X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=interia.pl header.s=biztos header.b=iien5tWD; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: UAomChA8GHe7 Dnia 2020-08-04, o godz. 00:40:25 maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com napisa=C5=82(a): > Hello Jan! Hi! > This doesn't seem to be the canonical place to get the latest > chatview. Rather, it lives in the LRC repo [0]. It was copied there > sometime in 2019, and no new commit were made to the repo you used > above since. Didn't notice that, thanks. I was too busy looking for the source of the pjproject bug. > [0] > https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-lrc/commits/master/src/web-cha= tview >=20 > As I understand it, jami-chatview is *not* maintained as a distinct > component upstream, hence it makes little sense to maintain it as one > in Guix: it'd burden us with maintaining it, with little to no gain. > IIUC, all we need is to symlink the web-chatview from the lrc > package, which every Jami clients will already depend on. I was hoping Jami developers will make it a separate package or at least add some CMake rules to install it properly, but they're busy doing other things. The problem is it is file when installing from a tarball, but libringclient fetched from git only contains symlinks in ./webchat pointing to a higher directory "../../" - this doesn't make sense outside of the context of tarball or source fetched to right directories. > The suggestion I'd make to upstream is to *install* those files as > part of a LRC installation (somewhere under share/), and then have > the build system check for their presence at configure time and use > them directly. >=20 > Does that make sense? Yes. I'm lazily refactoring my code allowing fetching from git - I made a diff of directories of Jami built from tarball and from git and I exactly know where to place webchat. I'll just fix the libringclient package. > Maxim Thanks Jan Wielkiewicz