From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YBn1GDmAIV//ZAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:57:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id OPLjFDmAIV/wFgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:57:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C91139403E7 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45662 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0mZy-0000Sw-5i for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:57:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0mZq-0000SD-NC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:57:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50086) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0mZq-0005AO-Dt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:57:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0mZq-0001UM-CF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#26302: Multilingual web site is on-line! Resent-From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26302 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Julien Lepiller Received: via spool by 26302-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26302.15960309805674 (code B ref 26302); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 26302) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2020 13:56:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33399 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0mZ9-0001TS-PA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:56:19 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.de ([5.45.111.108]:34894 helo=mail.pelzflorian.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0mZ5-0001TK-AK for 26302@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:56:18 -0400 Received: from pelzflorian.localdomain (unknown [5.45.111.108]) by mail.pelzflorian.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2567C3602A4; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:56:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pelzflorian.de; s=mail; t=1596030974; bh=e1Vx27NHLNsKN9eB9E3hVCSBcwCjs8DgZPQJdcLtRTs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=oztCTFjJsD65WSzN6i1zDbFZYqVSpJXBEB3LyCewFum19+HcypPAP9FOmXaMMS8F3 4ueu+2x6YwHNqzExZzJERilW0ccbzfSsWsJSUWFO5d6TzG8zwHqWoxI9I3l2VP5sK5 Kv4XMtbzU6HoSZtkoPCvRxNLVVxZnH4oRmdeEERk= Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:56:02 +0200 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Message-ID: <20200729135338.nqtpk3tugxlsjlu2@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20200705090808.7c7ihjnymo6hv7ch@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87d054bzru.fsf@gnu.org> <20200709144524.fjri2znqer2dzn7a@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200710172732.7a2tm7hcqt4mmhlo@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200712061927.uoubuabreji4dw54@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87d04i2mpc.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <20200726185740.p2cobbqpyevywpkl@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200727160101.nsznenkv75wcsuoe@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87k0yns416.fsf@gnu.org> <20200729032053.27c8ad4b@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200729032053.27c8ad4b@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Daniela Lura , sirgazil , 26302 <26302@debbugs.gnu.org> Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=pelzflorian.de header.s=mail header.b=oztCTFjJ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.49 X-TUID: 4YATCUgjIdhZ On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:21:09AM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le Tue, 28 Jul 2020 23:50:13 +0200, > Ludovic Courtès a écrit : > > > > I’m not as enthusiastic as you are about the TP but why not. > > Julien, what are your thoughts? > > Not sure we're going to do the switch soon, so we can send it to the TP. Since there is no Makefile, I suppose it is enough to put the website directory of the guix-artwork repo in a tar file. What version number should we give it? That of Guix, or a YYYYMMDD? I suppose the version number should be part of the POT file’s Project-Id-Version field and the tar filename, but I don’t know. Should we at the same time send a tarball of Guix’ prospective new release? Could you Julien or someone else send the tarball(s) off to the TP coordinator? Regards, Florian