From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6A8VEdkcIV8sGQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:53:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id uIXxDNkcIV+7UwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:53:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932259404E1 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45772 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0fxe-0002lY-0p for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:53:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0fxX-0002lQ-6Z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:53:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48355) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0fxW-0004zj-Fl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0fxW-0003Wm-EH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42390] [PATCH] gnu: Add python-mamba. Resent-From: Tanguy Le Carrour Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42390 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Hartmut Goebel , 42390-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42390-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D42390.159600554613518 (code D ref 42390); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:53:02 +0000 Received: (at 42390-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2020 06:52:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59901 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0fww-0003Vx-DG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:52:26 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:47525) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0fwu-0003Vj-54 for 42390-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:52:25 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 176.159.32.89 Received: from localhost (176-159-32-89.abo.bbox.fr [176.159.32.89]) (Authenticated sender: tanguy@bioneland.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 388DFE0004; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:52:16 +0200 From: Tanguy Le Carrour Message-ID: <20200729065216.nqn5zz7ckkpxzq7h@rafflesia> References: <20200716122530.29231-1-tanguy@bioneland.org> <87blk8n7l5.fsf@gnu.org> <20200722073655.qhwhps7dntfipml3@melmoth> <87v9ifj0mq.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2n98372.fsf@gnu.org> <4266ee5e-b45a-86d6-42db-f8bace0ea298@crazy-compilers.com> <20200727081012.yc3u6t3nmm3k3uli@melmoth> <87bljzs3qp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87bljzs3qp.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.51 X-TUID: rLpay5EroPtu Hi, Le 07/28, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : > Tanguy Le Carrour skribis: > > > The question is now: is it possible to make the warning go away by > > marking it as being an "exception" in the package definition? > > Are comments "part of the code" and be used for that? Can we use a > > different package name (`python-coverage-propagated`) that would not > > be in the list? > > We could use a property, similar to how the ‘lint-hidden-cve’ property > is handled by the ‘cve’ linter. Sounds great! … unless you expected me to implement it! ^_^' I guesse `check-inputs-should-be-native` should look a bit like `check-vulnerabilities`, but I have no idea how to do that! Sorry! -- Tanguy