From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aAZXCAfeEV8QEAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:21:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id dQcsBAfeEV9JEQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:21:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABC869404D3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54432 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwU2n-0007Cl-28 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:21:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwU2g-0007CZ-99 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:21:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwU2f-0006IB-VI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:21:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwU2f-0000cG-Qb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#42321: qgis PyQgsExpressionBuilderWidget test fails Resent-From: Wiktor =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=BBelazny?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42321 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 42321@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42321.15950064402333 (code B ref 42321); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 42321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2020 17:20:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57995 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwU2K-0000bZ-JZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:20:40 -0400 Received: from freeshell.de ([94.247.40.156]:55750 ident=postfix) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwU2H-0000bO-IE for 42321@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:20:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 19:20:29 +0200 From: Wiktor =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=BBelazny?= Message-ID: <20200717172029.3mbg6szfwlao7nze@wzguix> Mail-Followup-To: 42321@debbugs.gnu.org X-PGP-Key: https://freeshell.de/~wz/pubkey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: BDC9 74CD D9C9 BA7D 761A 573D C735 A8C6 AB60 79D5 References: <20200711143634.6lhd54yp3glxpp3k@wzguix> <87o8oe16af.fsf@yamatai> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4oycithglla26bog" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o8oe16af.fsf@yamatai> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=freeshell.de (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.51 X-TUID: IH/6TN3zr7QQ --4oycithglla26bog Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 05:59:36PM +0200, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: > > Do you get this test failure every time, or does it fail randomly? Hi, Thanks for taking a look. I attempted to build it twice with some weeks in between, hoping that the issue disappears as the package definition gets revised or some inputs change. It has never built successfully, though, until I disabled the offending test. As I was thinking about it, I began to suspect that the problem might be caused by outdated input definitions in my private channel. Before qGIS became officially available, I used the channel to install it, and the dependencies are still there. Perhaps, Guix has been using those to build qGIS rather than the ones from the main channel. I=E2=80=99ll try to = check it out next week. W=C5=BB --4oycithglla26bog Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAABCgB9FiEEvcl0zdnJun12Glc9xzWoxqtgedUFAl8R3d1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJE Qzk3NENERDlDOUJBN0Q3NjFBNTczREM3MzVBOEM2QUI2MDc5RDUACgkQxzWoxqtg edX3MA/+OOA30FI2DQ+LNUQye6rKHv0JG0J8ui8JSyGsUxDRU3WZjgqUuaXNvkGn 90eBYXkT4tt1fVLszChgxh4dI6TfZUPQGeFnFwVWMSoMc87yP5F/qveyoyiHml4h VUy3B+ATXK3Bi4N/fMgB9ybYG2JOBbOztnNlKPHxNa515pkw4hfknv6/JvGKO4QG sSxUrJbqfvL5L2GNxR1IPTSGt1XI1GTgUPOsVMC80HUgjOnFa5YHPxmhc55krm/i ISsSyVD8Ou19tLWb+S+FH0TJxbVoxkmsH+9jZKxsVb2D/vszKd1Trq74lGdZ86Kh 7VHtLLekhtTNy9r7Ddnl47922f95S9nZi8GPfcOjfoj8vYmu/RzPy2yem8HqfAEn Bwhs4Y+smXn/Cru0KKbsWnDuDwBxmUmS5s+zkIoFA/0M/HRycoW2YNKOvhVjQdFF 5nzdwQh01oznLVh5/4TvMWg1JjLIRFwNEq/sQ2+vvM1NGVVvbPzblcpS3pDBEVEk 3H+t40lvLXBrjh2TEGCxjZVQdLC9o70/87HVcC25+l8zam2GoCCZ7T65KILj+JJx E6Wk9+8/c+2z5Ijto5tDmkoeYV6pUWK0i0kgvfJR0PjE2URqmvtKaG91ZV+QS0Ts Zqs+4b4iiFjg1e3MjSwOgL1sNXJpqkhAMwA2kujloRHXQo1EiiU= =IXjR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4oycithglla26bog--