From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aN+yGabW816UDwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 22:41:42 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id KMOLFabW8169UgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 22:41:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB67F940703 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 22:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41094 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1joE5M-00082c-P6 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:41:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1joE5D-00081B-6D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:41:31 -0400 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:42748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1joE5B-0001yG-4C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:41:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (80-110-127-207.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at [80.110.127.207]) by dd26836.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30544336874D; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:41:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 00:40:28 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic To: Raghav Gururajan Subject: Re: [OUTREACHY]: Integration of desktop environments into GNU Guix Message-ID: <20200625004018.62dd2ac5@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20200506051334.4558e7b3.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> <8c56bfdd-4080-9444-d3c2-7bd962c4c687@disroot.org> <49cc7f39-7bce-f5a1-55da-5f9bca203627@disroot.org> <7fc9e1ff-de86-56e0-386b-8e1eb9d54585@disroot.org> <1742d1f9-43ed-83a5-1354-bf1c94c2f679@disroot.org> <30888750-2c5b-d94f-6199-f8539b2d0de0@disroot.org> <73cb94f7-d7b4-ec0a-5942-e701a18bdf5c@disroot.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/=nv0yuF4h8yI4uGI4O90Q_F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Received-SPF: none client-ip=85.13.145.193; envelope-from=dannym@scratchpost.org; helo=dd26836.kasserver.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/24 18:41:26 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.11 X-TUID: Xa1D0nKguRl9 --Sig_/=nv0yuF4h8yI4uGI4O90Q_F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi RG, * In ruby-slim: Why are tests disabled? There are tests. * In libmpeg3: Could you unbundle a52dec-0.7.3? It's bundled right now. * In flux, a git commit is used. We usually don't package non-releases. Is there a good reason? * 0019-gnu-Add-asciidoctor.patch does some other stuff to other packages, a= nd that fact isn't mentioned in the commit log in the patch. Why not? * If nng is compatible with nanomsg, why do we need the "nanomsg" package a= t all? * In tesseract-ocr you propagate leptonica. Why? If we did that, users that would install tesseract for the "tesseract" bi= nary would get leptonica in their profile. Is it necessary? * ccextractor still has a XXX. Does it work? * In libtimidity, what's the problem with libtimidity using its own "play" binary? I would expect the package to test itself like that... * In faac, what do the comments "Newer code" and "Older code" mean? * In flite, there are tests, but they fail. * In libopenmpt, why does it propagate zlib? That sounds wrong. For ruby-slim there IS a "test" subdirectory--so why are they disabled? For the time being I've not applied any of those patches since it's difficu= lt to leave some off and still be able to apply the others. I have applied most of the patches in your patchset of your previous E-Mail. --Sig_/=nv0yuF4h8yI4uGI4O90Q_F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl7z1lwACgkQ5xo1VCww uqVFKwgAhQr6yWtDitl+vOPxDZH+SC4M+WCesOeDkzjK/G8KPqcmxmagK7TuhGGM jcBiGJp/SHAS/23+6OJZGVhp4jcWJvAPq7Jpu6wBotkSBvrmnMdi4n7votn84WTP M8hgvYgk8Br6baWkRiLm3uu1X/sWwjizWCxjO4PM803PlPvX5ecH5UfSXRsU7B7l YHdNxRjZ9/soK3k7gW2uhfa1TWU6qc5cT7SfqRTKYnlV+XqT+4s0INCn34gb54Kd 2TKmlVHT5T6DaGk+HFVivrIeMN+WopchF0scku+l52C0sktuuULVVf3qcOKxa5nm 1JYBSmcqG/GR9dacN9q9Vq7YS/dadg== =MRX2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/=nv0yuF4h8yI4uGI4O90Q_F--