From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CPcLBOyY3F5uPwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 07:36:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id UMmRO+uY3F5QBwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 07:36:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5024994066C for ; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 07:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50842 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhpqi-0008Am-2b for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 03:36:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhpqc-0008Ac-Em for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 03:36:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhpqc-0002rs-5w for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 03:36:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhpqc-0001YP-2Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 03:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#28226] go with gccgo still relevant? Resent-From: Efraim Flashner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 07:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28226 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Jack Hill Cc: 28226@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 28226-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28226.15915153045903 (code B ref 28226); Sun, 07 Jun 2020 07:36:02 +0000 Received: (at 28226) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jun 2020 07:35:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53266 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhppc-0001Wk-QB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 03:35:04 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:44574) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhppa-0001WX-Op for 28226@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 03:34:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [188.120.128.90]) by flashner.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BD27400B5; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 07:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 10:34:19 +0300 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: <20200607073419.GB24239@E5400> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x41AAE7DCCA3D8351 X-PGP-Key: https://flashner.co.il/~efraim/efraim_flashner.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.61 X-TUID: xUGBrFLlbo/B --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 07:58:15PM -0400, Jack Hill wrote: > Efraim, >=20 > I cam across this old bug. Do you think it is still relevant? >=20 > Best, > Jack Yes and no. The patches I provided didn't work as expected, but we do want to have an alternate go implementation for architectures which aren't supported by go-1.4. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl7cmHcACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1GIyA//SGSFlg5TKj8Y6xQNkOgFrQrv/BVtX99z4wjzdVEMLlvGq5ZSX+IKDi46 +08IkrMICncXZ6lxrl0AcK9K8HSfrNkir21UXycu0Rraw3cYIDLCEcitnDQdbRkY DsAoWRAesyrgCOFCLVG7gkxGBZkK8Zd0uaohsUVdqkIVy8T8GT/+dGuvdfylzIb1 Lr58w1LRu+59Y1U1P9w77nEXkJv7JXXhYRaXcK9gpaRu2VjfQQkA1QiZnavkV4kB p7Zk9KmG3c+WoX7376q27v0YhmKbTQemWcYzI0Rnt1meEXolAdrUKEWDilBVt395 cDKNdUzkNn++LJVLnp/mDaa7IpPLoA+7wRV7Jy1GeUoaRS+/VCR5202/f3x/vHlN 8AYTi+tef5qfw5MdYGPQ4hwoJwtavYQYlIECbSloftdWEW5eHroKh03BE9C8n1A5 1iLwb+iZguY1YkP4jgUJPm5gPJbhlCHgi0TSKU2p3Vl5Fk+yoX7RrvU5TtdnLt6p n0meOITB2Mv03oqHiDLjCEuDIsh+Md8qiha3CXaAhBOMolC5Bfe72wcp1KeJ+68d /CakNHuWvTIA1QV8BjuJWap8vnpeSX5v/wsSdn0jVowto9d2wVvhgDRCgqDIKVHe ctwQ8himhT6AEfcTmtuVmPKgDtFHwkqT8RQAbpF+ePYGhELl92s= =EkNC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y--