From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QLd0IPTA1l77NAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 21:13:24 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 2DtXHPTA1l7mLQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 21:13:24 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E8CF940145 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:32794 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgEDq-0002XK-KU for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:13:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgEDh-0002W8-GH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:13:13 -0400 Received: from pat.zlotemysli.pl ([37.59.186.212]:39204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgEDg-0000je-53 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:13:13 -0400 Received: (qmail 6645 invoked by uid 1009); 2 Jun 2020 23:13:09 +0200 Received: from 188.123.215.55 (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat.zlotemysli.pl (envelope-from , uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-2.08st (clamdscan: 0.98.6/25830. spamassassin: 3.4.0. perlscan: 2.08st. Clear:RC:1(188.123.215.55):. Processed in 0.038954 secs); 02 Jun 2020 21:13:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gravity) (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat.zlotemysli.pl with SMTP; 2 Jun 2020 23:13:09 +0200 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 23:13:08 +0200 From: Jakub =?utf-8?B?S8SFZHppb8WCa2E=?= To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: branch staging updated: gnu: ghc-7: Clean up package definition. Message-ID: <20200602211308.fqbrw4axxknff6of@gravity> References: <20200601154315.6307.59562@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <875zc9w9vs.fsf@gnu.org> <20200602194527.czie5ul7r3fzieja@gravity> <87tuztuson.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lwsbvjwpu4bih3ht" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tuztuson.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: none client-ip=37.59.186.212; envelope-from=kuba@kadziolka.net; helo=pat.zlotemysli.pl X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/02 15:45:29 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.61 X-TUID: HpPMMM/82WmV --lwsbvjwpu4bih3ht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 10:19:20PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka writes: >=20 > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 09:22:31PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > >> We should have a better way to poll branch status other than "read all > >> messages on guix-devel" or "ask Marius on IRC". > > > > Ouch, sorry for that! I see two potential solutions: > > > > 1. Have a guix-devel-announce mailing list, to which we would post > > things concerning all Guix developers. >=20 > Actually we already have an underutilized 'info-guix' list. I suppose > that can work. Huh, I thought this was for communicating to Guix users. > > 2. Configure the git server to reject pushes to frozen branches when > > unless --force is used. >=20 > It will be difficult for the server to distinguish between 'bug fixes' > and 'huge rebuilds'. Not sure if the --force flag propagates to servers > the way you are thinking of, but perhaps it can work (not a great habit > though!). =46rom the various behaviors of git servers I have observed, I would be really surprised if it wasn't... > Also, we'd have to bother the Savannah admins every time we 'freeze' a > branch. I suppose we could have a dotfile in the repository... > Another option could be to create a tracking bug with a special tag that > can be displayed by issues.guix.gnu.org. It could also show any merge > blockers such as to make it > easier to contribute. Makes sense. We'd need to update the Commit Access section accordingly. Regards, Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka --lwsbvjwpu4bih3ht Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE5Xa/ss9usT31cTO54xWnWEYTFWQFAl7WwOAACgkQ4xWnWEYT FWT7bA/+NdwMo5/Uw/HpHO6AemwWtbP3yrqXBDg+EoCZOBmLbskXl90eVFTGYl0b bM00Kgy4tKULkDpdwdxm+ADmf5tNJ2eopJ7ry+KCsVZTx6yGRdibHR2FVtDub5/9 jYsNmNo+PnRPtns+F001dZofKOyC3YmwY4bj5UOsebz36UUhzoPdkzqlikOcrwhn pS2PyMuLn7MUCUhXoTcNaCRad6sDEXXnONvoZCF6O6qcdQhYrOet91T9JcC3jq4R F+695BaH76ugHmrkACFIOBtP5pbqVUjKOOsL3EAA7SBiGoBBj1lpbCJWq0vZag/u +M8iZH7xTIemu4Ekx2a4VkAJ1JSrOK/5rxgBkxG8c0Tm3H2kcoD7tYxRoOeoetrI iJ4L1XaDZ4N70KNOgVu/QPX/N2DF3nyjiWIYFgzsECeS0uly1+Ik3ZrZcAskfhBf dfScJkwXZThOjbvTG+MjxfrJkbewemcAsSvxghIP2BCA58mJjtVEz7yDc3XsE7Z8 vFToqqkuBPVvaMhbParZaWcYoDN1eBTjmZqIoaTDMv3xr9rHEWPKioOiWqtWu1Nm VAV1e062aDHu410gjqyca2NWWYUJ3EgXC46Ejm+/hRshqdc+UbkEebsn0Qdi4wlL PRJbxKYiToQ8ztyI8Q+ysEJBSOHFGzSNnoYwCc+luJR3D07vExI= =z4sg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lwsbvjwpu4bih3ht--