From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id eMTaKc+gzl7zaAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:18:07 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id aEDDJc+gzl6oAgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:18:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 317969400EF for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 17:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46958 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdzgs-0005NV-7H for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdzgo-0005NA-Kw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdzgo-0003FO-CA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdzgo-00088r-8k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#41565] [PATCH] doc: Use existing URLs and file names in installation instructions. Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 17:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41565 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 41565@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 41565-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41565.159059986031269 (code B ref 41565); Wed, 27 May 2020 17:18:02 +0000 Received: (at 41565) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2020 17:17:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdzgR-00088H-LN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:17:39 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:56527) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jdzgP-000882-Ja for 41565@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:17:38 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFF05C018A; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:17:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 May 2020 13:17:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=gyuEE73I6yBXvm65qXuQOUa5 3GYcHcVUgS6OaWzzZo4=; b=W/QV6eFCey2jdiSUp1SpIYM5lTLtlmrdnbeQZE8C GzhHpUN4qn8QiCJmt4ib1UBZ0UEsb0hmN5TQjz+Oc0LUotJbiuTVSTO9iGJsu/Xf /FmDDevrnUFwqURZbOxjzOrolLxC8ISoatCaWhpccmu4A8F4xAAPvo+xw3t3gfPg gDk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=gyuEE7 3I6yBXvm65qXuQOUa53GYcHcVUgS6OaWzzZo4=; b=Psi2EjeeegiL9w6550XeHp 7x342hvFNNYQj6HnCuxvZqngUA0i055PCjnLBz/lBCHgY0X9p1v6gS02yNdzhCfn wakS04927zFBcjro7Z2wHBsXYHDkBpBAzEC5RO6TjiGIA6jaEY8kLJAtS6jMItjH JeE42QVlwELehUvIeE6XpT+rj6qJ6H4qjC46/y0y0x5PA5wXJjThg+oZyvUgpkJi VzZXRPell1/vGoz7x1XEeIaIbP4O1gim49cbxjb0n2TVIiCa5r+LeoVrW5gyfCJO Ig6zlVqhv8xSJabJqr/U04gs8Rt8Zyw99zXC0Zz2VdjXimXVpWGe5jIyiSTEQjEw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddvgedguddttdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeffkeeuiefhhefhvefgvddvledukeehjeehvedutdfgvedvieejvdffffet ffeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehmrghsthhoughonhdrshhotghirghlnecukfhppeejiedrud dvgedrudefkedrieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghi lhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D8898328005D; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:17:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 13:17:30 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200527171730.GC28889@jasmine.lan> References: <20200527173013.36a11a54@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200527173013.36a11a54@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=W/QV6eFC; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=Psi2Ejee; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: ccPBFI7EujGa On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 05:30:13PM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Some users seem to be confused by the fact that our URLs in the manual > don't work for them. This is most likely because they copy them > without reading the rest of the text which clearly says they should > replace @var{system} with one of the supported values. One example of > this confusion is this conversation: > https://mastodon.social/@Nixfreak/104224784493287104 > > Since our current approach doesn't seem to be very effective, I propose > to change the URLs and file names with actual ones, using x86_64-linux > as the system because this is the most popular platform that we support > nowadays. I keep mentioning the other architectures as alternatives, > hoping that users will notice the x86_64 in the URL and keep reading to > learn how to install Guix for another architecture if they want to. I agree, it's a common mistake for new users. Your patch seems like the right thing to do...