From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id EEofJ8VVzV6GPwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:45:41 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id aAgII8VVzV6QewAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:45:41 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 965E39403EA for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54644 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdddz-0002bl-El for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 13:45:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdddg-0002al-K3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 13:45:20 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:53855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdddf-0001Nj-GR for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 13:45:20 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FC45C0106; Tue, 26 May 2020 13:45:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 May 2020 13:45:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=67fBC/tyDa/zn37Fp1NcU3VC gSjeQKRqYL4jfTLo6qY=; b=X57f/V7FKe9PkdpH/cReuJ7FHnDdeui2VdFKV2NU Q4nxPg/sNIUQe09ZC7SEw6L78f0Ldb9LzzPXM6deiU67rAQsuETeG/leY1huwHr6 KOmeRGG3jjj/4pt+cZRBoONVISuSclG1nrsmciHH5KnCoLqvXUnkMrmTZ7ULQRwB S7c= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=67fBC/ tyDa/zn37Fp1NcU3VCgSjeQKRqYL4jfTLo6qY=; b=puQVMNRHP6jWEUX5XuoMul mOybmiibNp4O53k9JIpGUQC4S1AneWUPIZ2B4U//XP8X407Z756qrz8BecZUpN31 8FNhhmVGXp9J0SrtL3p0zp9hABSLyw+HkpvaS6Y76+iJr7jGx2ibSb/pYHCyEE1T 8fDxpXDVcOaaJ0jlAAxhZJ8EL6778tYk16xREBwfMP0+ClSY2S5DojzFO/NyndYF uqb5a8b0+joN/e7YD4nP/zTM6cSXZLu51B/IGxJavVDgy7c6f5igTsVAlqjGXXBt 42l8+/rgsgX6W548FsAuwcrfmp3lRinrZZr68QkoaRhmIxmoehzuc/R1mCMkD9Pw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddvvddgudduhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepgeduveekheejgefhkeekleehtdevheeijeejkeduiedvuddvvdejgeetveej tdeunecuffhomhgrihhnpehlihgsrhgvphhlrghnvghtrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejiedrud dvgedrudefkedrieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghi lhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0A5A63280059; Tue, 26 May 2020 13:45:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 13:45:15 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Subject: Re: Vanilla Firefox recipe? Message-ID: <20200526174515.GA25821@jasmine.lan> References: <87v9l2thi5.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87y2pyfc3d.fsf@yamatai> <20200512192319.GA918@E5400> <9077d3bf-1f83-6e08-341d-7f7be5387f42@hyperbola.info> <87367nydku.fsf@dustycloud.org> <87o8qawqr7.fsf@dustycloud.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o8qawqr7.fsf@dustycloud.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.27; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out3-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/26 12:41:51 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=X57f/V7F; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=puQVMNRH; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.31 X-TUID: /VuMB2K1kFBS --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 01:27:40PM -0400, Christopher Lemmer Webber wrote: > So this page explains the problem: >=20 > https://libreplanet.org/wiki/List_of_software_that_does_not_respect_the= _Free_System_Distribution_Guidelines >=20 > "Problem: Recommends non-free addons and plugins; automatically downloads= cisco's binary h.264 codecs" >=20 > I agree the latter is a problem. The former is kind of maybe a problem, > but mostly because it isn't clear that it's happening to the user. >=20 > However, I wonder if, with a matter of just two patches, this could be > resolved: >=20 > - Patch out the automatic download of Cisco's h.264 plugin. > - Add a warning banner *above* the extensions page, or simply switch it > to the same one that Icecat already uses. >=20 > Is that all that's necessary, then, to get "vanilla Firefox" in Guix? > It strikes me that with those two changes, the criteria would be met. I agree, it would be a good addition. --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAl7NVasACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi+2g/9GbbmWoooczKlofL6gOnLpTMS6X5rQ7uoBp57cBQkmxz5eqfi4NT1yxaM 24TkdQlza3h275nLnZdhLgyE4RYv36CX1PsmX80g1L9nBP03CtmBL8kMWr0K8QdU oZ2iMTDp2qmJE/9uaMUybn0Ar7nre7OZD7rIlTYFcJ3bdS5UBKilI8tWGlK+O43f iZIEN9/3OP6MB0ZZzCC90jinYMNvEwZkUNr5XPi+8IaGYGMqsyF+tFyyYodJspOU eAkUSQ7E0Cd/2SCogpdbUG34E/Y+jlF6H6iMcrfl0n5ZRKyItiryQeJ7ceOXErJQ uCvVy05n9kPssd9fWJMfP4z2jQupd/bOOhjRDdaJpzJnZAKHVWRRoz2sxofNRar2 f8KaDMUrEBdbyIWoZ3H//lXa9bzICvLj9qyCrGLZ5XgjXqT8Dm6Dvs+qdVjojVKh IaUkbndMwpmGJ1rtsrG0hwPF4/ODDtA1NK3SamIImfTKchxqmIp3QYWCA+GhE5k6 Q8WXeYWB5PaAZH8HZgRsqAHFlCy2zBySqcuArnqRskijmA1DCWQirbMsuBrfk3kd jHJ89/7QejqQ+DXd59C4HVj+4FVnN3YCRPLXnmN/F+B0hwJ3ZIcFj1vFN2+t5Iaf LgxtnGuId/Ab6F5ebO543ZCog37ISh3pV1h7eGzojlZppgbBStE= =qtQ1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--