From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id EJZUI3MwyF4ZEgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 20:05:07 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KKgVH3MwyF5XTwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 20:05:07 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF767940428 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 20:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59332 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcDuj-0008Lq-Nr for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:05:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcDuh-0008Lj-0T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:05:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jcDug-0007rc-Mn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:05:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcDug-0005jb-H3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#41193] [PATCH 00/13] Update network-manager suite Resent-From: Leo Famulari Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 20:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41193 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Brice Waegeneire Cc: 41193@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 41193-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41193.159017786822000 (code B ref 41193); Fri, 22 May 2020 20:05:02 +0000 Received: (at 41193) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2020 20:04:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60477 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcDu8-0005im-1k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:04:28 -0400 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.19]:57949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jcDu6-0005iX-Ag for 41193@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:04:26 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682D6C7F; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:04:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 22 May 2020 16:04:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=Sc3ot7VJjsDSDP1uVTIU837l fonY86IoV2YEdwUmiQI=; b=Z0C5hBFjImFcX6d64SOs+Qlt+JMhCa1kQeWS+MZk PW7DwwWeb0bSZLwcnA72CbQMo2SBWFvfhUcGneO45uj/HWZJqzqYQlDyyLlnyyZh 28lmTppNql+obnclNYIrTwO5cMdlEZgPe8pEvuqd89MdxYJD07djEu98xq9qKLNo ueA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Sc3ot7 VJjsDSDP1uVTIU837lfonY86IoV2YEdwUmiQI=; b=eHHMABZCgmgzSGa4AvQLJS rCcCdRNM8gO69YWMFwInaA8TgLK6SGTgOY1nKwR5kqoCYtggF8VQ8FsGp1Q/HqkI 8tZ4jfOctjllGZbwpetsqYuJyWOPK/h7cC50WmJtOXWSlrBI0WRyAyORIWF8tyO0 sN5IWiv7phIFtZ+buW8F8hHfF+qh9ry4/ljotAiiuacraUyHK1OjVzQh6JghNTgT JPBl+p/s8TJaWA3BJfqAFy0rikHY3MTQP6hMlsKh5k/8xmYSpVGaVhTr/A+Cm3pU qD8epP7CjW6lZCDusLTDGxWlbP0yXJ+mEE9M/2L668Phq382MIDtBf5HMKH25h0g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddufedgudegfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepueekkedtffdvtddugeejgedtvefhueefiedvjeeitdeigedtveejvdejheff vefgnecukfhppeejiedruddvgedrudefkedrieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 874C23066411; Fri, 22 May 2020 16:04:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 16:04:17 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200522200417.GA28872@jasmine.lan> References: <20200511185022.23667-1-brice@waegenei.re> <20200511200501.GF15862@jasmine.lan> <64fb5600a78a1bb4e47a2b946ba6f85b@waegenei.re> <20200512213613.GC12212@jasmine.lan> <6fa0c0446ff6f03b87fbb5f67a7c16ed@waegenei.re> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6fa0c0446ff6f03b87fbb5f67a7c16ed@waegenei.re> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=Z0C5hBFj; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=eHHMABZC; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: p8kuy8q55L4N On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:35:52PM +0000, Brice Waegeneire wrote: > I tired running the test but even on master it fails, CI can't built it > either. But trying to built it with my patches I manage to find 2 gnome > packages that broke because of it: they were looking for libnma in > network-manager-applet which isn't included with it anymore. There aren't > any other packages directly depending on network-manager-applet so there > shouldn't be any other breakage relating to this specific issue. Okay. > sirmacik tested the patchset too and used the vpnc plugin fine but as me > he is not a user of the applet. Should we wait for the test to be fixed, > before going forward with this patchset? We don't need to wait, since we got some good test results from you and sirmacik. It would be great to get the test working again but I don't think it should block these patches.