From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CMiMFlsXxF4VXQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 17:28:59 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id +KlkElsXxF4mHwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 17:28:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0591940B28 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 17:28:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40782 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb62z-00084x-KE for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:28:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb62j-00084Z-55 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:28:41 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:37761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jb62i-00068V-40; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:28:40 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294595C00F9; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:28:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 19 May 2020 13:28:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=glx9hohahxKL78k/4bvcBxMG wAoHitrnE4Wr+ZwJ+8s=; b=kCIdFuHeYtSuVGu51Oncc7SqUYjjqvk6kMZwLju0 z1VMibxi+iSi4T3g2Va1+Coxj7pUHLmkueXYiE2lWLWMh2AJtiPeKI3+dylhIyBh +el7cTVPUGTiykT0+oX8GUj5lAuZ+kGEYbNlAba1wDSNNZ1pQ+2Yn/IGHRWq7KAN LOM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=glx9ho hahxKL78k/4bvcBxMGwAoHitrnE4Wr+ZwJ+8s=; b=gOqHQiK2zEjdbgYSwiAYal Ow1wZ3KkWEzFnohqSgkH65q9aLZ4Jxq/fKnI12B75bFmdy1hQysDnbEyjFHgvP0K 9kyTClcnKt4tzt3aeoAAb4HTPGJTLhs2P0Fzvdtb1dfVkM5y5zF2jxiE1fmtyUc/ qyK/1t1vfVFcEdivBG3Ox3uO9z5u1b4bixbBB3bxvFp1cHICtBQ+Lzg2i1Y1r1ej jFxyITiusKZlOK9zwu/vPuzTiOATIqxQErTb5q8Fh307QVlKtSvBdPel+AZvMEu8 3cEPa3ZjTiHox6I02dPq85M1+NgGfdYgyuvw05gLAQ14iC8At2LNz0V6yCpyGApQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddtjedgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcu hfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepvddvudegffefiedttdfhfedvuefhgfekieekgeekveetgefhfeetgfeguedu ffeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecukfhppeejiedruddvgedrudefkedrie efnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgv ohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1F81E306643E; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:28:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:28:35 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Pierre Neidhardt Subject: Re: Guix closure size of a system? Message-ID: <20200519172835.GA4283@jasmine.lan> References: <871rngjvjn.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a724s206.fsf@devup.no> <87imgsi6xd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200519154134.GA24701@jasmine.lan> <87pnazgblt.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20200519162228.GA29967@jasmine.lan> <87blmjg9ex.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87blmjg9ex.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.28; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/19 13:27:43 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mathieu Othacehe , help-guix@gnu.org Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=kCIdFuHe; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=gOqHQiK2; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.99 X-TUID: 1j2tU6KMKMD/ On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 06:46:14PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Should I file a bug? I've done it: