From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CBtxB+NUs14kWAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 May 2020 00:22:59 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id ICC6Be9Us14uSAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 07 May 2020 00:23:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B9A940CFB for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 00:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57348 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWUJf-0003rW-4j for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 20:23:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWUJa-0003r8-Tq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 20:23:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58258) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWUJa-0004BO-Kc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 20:23:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWUJa-0002ny-GI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 20:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#40677] [PATCH V3 07/15] gnu: Add ffmpeg-jami. Resent-From: Jan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 00:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40677 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 40677@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 40677-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40677.158881097210747 (code B ref 40677); Thu, 07 May 2020 00:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 40677) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2020 00:22:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41571 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWUJQ-0002nH-5B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 20:22:52 -0400 Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.154]:32866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jWUJO-0002n1-64 for 40677@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 20:22:51 -0400 X-Interia-R: Interia X-Interia-R-IP: 89.64.43.193 X-Interia-R-Helo: Received: from kompiuter (89-64-43-193.dynamic.chello.pl [89.64.43.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 7 May 2020 02:22:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 02:22:30 +0200 From: Jan Message-ID: <20200507022230.71ed5ea6@kompiuter> In-Reply-To: <87d07ietnh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20200502011450.2676-1-tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> <20200502011450.2676-8-tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> <87368i1xwh.fsf@gmail.com> <20200504202631.1ebaf90b@kompiuter> <87d07ietnh.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Interia-Antivirus: OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=biztos; t=1588810963; bh=9l/YtqMVoNiNXaxBg1IkHXm9FUzT1gUH/VS9BlXCQN0=; h=X-Interia-R:X-Interia-R-IP:X-Interia-R-Helo:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Interia-Antivirus; b=UN2hlIP7GDYYopaIUt+0N1ndZWkB7/cGyhs2HOjkPAHiiryFzTzS7Ah1dJ1vInJKr xcSEhYt1YJYe+Q+fmAkyrSyqWINg9Bdq5AobaxSJyl6ZNLYePAsuex9padNfbsqAA8 cddS/eJMqlu+fZrxbaWyLk+nQkXJ4+vcMTc/1GIs= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.49 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=interia.pl header.s=biztos header.b=UN2hlIP7; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.49 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.4971698469987]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[interia.pl]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.11), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[interia.pl:s=biztos]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[interia.pl:-]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl,guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[89.64.43.193:received]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[interia.pl]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: FRlGh6Lkm01P Hi again! On Tue, 05 May 2020 09:18:58 +0200 Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > Hello Jan, > > Oh that's a disappointment indeed. Among those 95 flags I'm pretty > sure most of them match the default, but going through all of them > feels like a burden. > > Ok, this seems fine. Don't hesitate to add a link to a Web view of the > rules.mak file, so that it's clear where those flags come from. Done. > Another remark on this part, > > > "--enable-encoder=h264_nvenc" > > "--enable-encoder=hevc_nvenc")) > > ((string?= (%current-system) "aarch64-linux") > > '("--arch=aarch64")) ((string?= (%current-system) "arm64-linux") > > '("--arch=aarch64")) > > "arm64-linux" is not a valid system, you can remove it. Done. > > ((string?= (%current-system) "arm") '("--arch=arm")) > > I think the right system here is "armhf-linux". However, you would > also need to support cross-compilation when %current-target-system is > set. In that case, the value looks like "aarch64-linux-gnu" and > "arm-linux-gnueabihf". I added "%current-target-system" to support cross-compilation. Also fixed the drunk "string?=" uses - there's "string=?" actually and I replaced it with "string-prefix?". What's the difference between "arm-linux-gnueabihf" and "aarch64-linux-gnu"? Are they synonyms? Should it be: if "arm-linux-gnueabihf" or "aarch64-linux-gnu" use "--arch=armhf-linux"? > If you add support for those plaforms you need to test it by building > ffmpeg-jami with "--system" and "--target" flags. As this is a complex > package with a lot of dependencies (probably failing to > cross-compile), it would be fine with me if you just drop support for > other systems/targets. I want to try anyway. Jami supports Raspbian, so it is worth trying. > Thanks, > > Mathieu Jan Wielkiewicz