From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CICjKR6MrV7CXAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:05:02 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 4J4LAimMrV7DDAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 15:05:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B421941838 for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 15:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38774 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUthX-0006sg-At for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:05:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUthP-0006nq-Ad for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:05:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUthO-0004re-Qy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:05:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUthO-0004rG-Ce for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:05:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUthO-0003Un-4r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#40677] [PATCH V3 12/15] gnu: jami: Bump to 20200401.1.6f090de. Resent-From: Jan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 15:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40677 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 40677@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 40677-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40677.158843185613380 (code B ref 40677); Sat, 02 May 2020 15:05:02 +0000 Received: (at 40677) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2020 15:04:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53684 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUtge-0003Tk-30 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:04:16 -0400 Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl ([217.74.65.237]:53535) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUtgc-0003T5-MG for 40677@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 11:04:15 -0400 X-Interia-R: Interia X-Interia-R-IP: 89.64.43.193 X-Interia-R-Helo: Received: from kompiuter (89-64-43-193.dynamic.chello.pl [89.64.43.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 2 May 2020 17:04:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 17:04:05 +0200 From: Jan Message-ID: <20200502170405.650b500f@kompiuter> In-Reply-To: <87ftci1ye3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20200502011450.2676-1-tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> <20200502011450.2676-13-tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> <87ftci1ye3.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Interia-Antivirus: OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=interia.pl; s=biztos; t=1588431849; bh=LT6fGtRY+Ivo4BrgVVAXjRxNEgo/EZsYp1C+Mdd/IVg=; h=X-Interia-R:X-Interia-R-IP:X-Interia-R-Helo:Date:From:To:Cc: Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Interia-Antivirus; b=eXC3/rj2xchi1dKbg9sluIaZRSYtmCP8X5puidVVnEr8kUDBT7TCcCWIFy+NyAESq 2aYIvEkhTHS2wPHtZlbkfihzCll5cjEo5ORw8DdZ3qA542m2NaWxQhMg5Qxjp8d39U aTOvXuF6PmKGflSmykcqIPXi2EOX7D/i86HexkOQ= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 3.79 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=interia.pl header.s=biztos header.b=eXC3/rj2; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [3.79 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49503386471386]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[interia.pl]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.15), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.50)]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[interia.pl:s=biztos]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[interia.pl:-]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[89.64.43.193:received]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl,guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(3.00)[89.64.43.193:received]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[interia.pl]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: Z29P8F1U+Z9Q On Sat, 02 May 2020 11:25:56 +0200 Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > -(define %jami-version "20191101.3.67671e7") > > +(define %jami-version "20200401.1.6f090de") > > Ok, so I merged this one with the previous one. As you noted pjproject > still fails to build in 2.10. Even if Jami variant is now ok, it would > be great if you could fix pjproject build too. I can try, but haven't succeeded so far. > Thanks, > > Mathieu Jan Wielkiewicz