From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jS3cL-0007P5-4v for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:04:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jS3cJ-00059a-J5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:04:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jS3cI-00057T-4h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:04:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jS3cH-0002bD-Tg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:04:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#40752] gnu: Add eject. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:02:41 -0400 From: Raghav Gururajan Message-ID: <20200424150241.62024541.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> In-Reply-To: <20200424144621.6c832973.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> References: <20200421162206.527fd8c8.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> <20200422085501.161d6605@scratchpost.org> <20200422212110.0b1e978b.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> <87k12620bp.fsf@gnu.org> <20200424144621.6c832973.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: Danny Milosavljevic , 40752@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:46:21 -0400 Raghav Gururajan wrote: > Hi Jan! > > > This page > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spacefm/ > > > > suggests that on Arch, SpaceFM is using eject from util-linux. Wouldn't > > it be nice to do that in Guix too? Maybe you can see how they did it? > > Thanks for the info. I tried and it works. But I am wondering why to use > 'util-linux' package just for one utility. This 'eject' package will be > smaller dependency than 'util-linux' package. What do you think? On the second thought, 'util-linux' is better maintained. So I'll close this ticket. Regards, RG.