From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRbyR-0003Gw-Hr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:33:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRbyR-00054H-3p for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:33:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRbyQ-00053a-OA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:33:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jRbyQ-0005wS-LY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:33:02 -0400 Subject: bug#40643: [PATCH] git-version: Handle invalid arguments gracefully Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:32:01 +0200 From: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= Message-ID: <20200423133201.7cif3mwfdotazedt@gravity> References: <20200415151824.22988-1-kuba@kadziolka.net> <87v9lx95j7.fsf@gnu.org> <20200421224545.ztr7beu3mqaufyo3@gravity> <87pnbzwo85.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4ue6jgknhzaku74h" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pnbzwo85.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 40643-done@debbugs.gnu.org --4ue6jgknhzaku74h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 05:10:18PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > It must be because you forgot to include (srfi srfi-34): there are two > =E2=80=98raise=E2=80=99 procedure, and in core Guile =E2=80=98raise=E2=80= =99 is about signals, not error > conditions. Thanks! That did it! I pushed an updated patch. Regards, Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka --4ue6jgknhzaku74h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE5Xa/ss9usT31cTO54xWnWEYTFWQFAl6hmM0ACgkQ4xWnWEYT FWQsBA//TB4DOC0ZBqNdfhdS1Z0T8U0AfgJP40NhPwNMoEIpt3CE+rPvuOY5weAq PpJkQraWo0icPYLvvxqwT9s1b7AVqhrkMm+EVjhY3ggmBvl4dzT3NAS5M84qBQQ8 3xcPTClVo5sHFeo/6Q7cR3SevA/fNR764QKlQN++ie4bW+k48snDy+ZnB2qIzp9x HpUFuWtN4ljV17Fw7sLSQIZ+vzBL/p/FL67dntvOOtqFn2lD5k1qZJ7xh7yHI8iw TZnBXsTNAqGmpaR8xlZzyoXTgZt0PylzLPFODFK4oTK4+R3Dqb3mamTI6zk6G1wx SjwVTUypqsIvFYpAHyeFfThFO2CxOHNIpfv/DaquH1Suiksf6+9098AUZFdoDvB4 zBugRWjOA/zt0iS7iRFtKKHV7Q3vsqirrcy6QvD9wwiYVIaClbK4Gz0qM5yag27+ XLkqSbO3D4Tps46ewvEQomVh/6yqCodyhZg3dxikUUAkN5s3t5rA0H3ta6RpW1Oc 5AfdbV5Mg/YXh8Ur9eBS11PRzGB54owxzClg3d7EsZ0uJwrZGWGKvNF6Y8vjoQb4 /hXDS5p5n6wkAN/TuftbjvHAKwmHetyT35UvIsZXNBjHSGfYQLCbbGcMDXEbO8sD jXqek54w2vIgOvy4lZ1CKjJA0A5kygqNxNDi+G3t0y+AWPRZNLQ= =3eo/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4ue6jgknhzaku74h--