From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#40538: installer: Support uvesafb to install on machines without KMS. Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 23:31:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20200414213137.zerxceuddei4vga6@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20200412090257.jxljqbkwfhn7afnr@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200412112400.x4qufeztdnkmzqhx@pelzflorian.localdomain> <874ktooj3v.fsf@gmail.com> <20200412153052.ewxdd6m4f6yar2jw@pelzflorian.localdomain> <871roqlebf.fsf@gmail.com> <20200414081652.vjdu7d6w2u5piud4@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87h7xmz8dz.fsf@gnu.org> <20200414102838.n776paycpuy6kykx@pelzflorian.localdomain> <20200414131404.gzashg4iyuyfdoua@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87pnca9epo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOTA3-00055u-Vb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:32:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOTA3-0005lS-2j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:32:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOTA2-0005lC-V8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:32:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jOTA2-00086h-Qj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:32:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pnca9epo.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 40538-done@debbugs.gnu.org On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 07:09:23PM +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > Hey Florian, > > > They do show that the uvesafb shepherd service was started, even when > > it did not load uvesafb. Maybe the shepherd service should be > > renamed. > > I did check on my recent hardware, the module is not loaded anymore and > everything works fine. On my old Intel machine, I guess uvesafb was > messing with i915, and as you pointed out, "nomodeset" was required. > > With your recent patch, uvesafb is not loaded and it works fine out of > the box. > > Thanks a lot for all the effort your are investing into this :) > > Mathieu I’m glad. Thank you for testing. Closing. :) Regards, Florian