From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: Hyperlinks! Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:38:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20200413203819.63e0c525@scratchpost.org> References: <87eesrlkil.fsf@gnu.org> <20200413132638.1ce12721@scratchpost.org> <87d08buujt.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/sh7qexn8dO_H+eIa.nnuV/y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jO3yT-0002S5-Nh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:38:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jO3yS-00043F-MS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:38:25 -0400 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:48446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jO3yS-000425-Fr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:38:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d08buujt.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/sh7qexn8dO_H+eIa.nnuV/y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ricardo, On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 20:09:26 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: >=20 > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:58:42 +0200 > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > =20 > >> (If anyone knows how to get =E2=80=98a.syntax-symbol=E2=80=99 CSS diff= erent from just > >> =E2=80=98a=E2=80=99, I=E2=80=99m all ears!) =20 > [=E2=80=A6] > > a.syntax-symbol { > > color: red; > > } > > a:not(.syntax-symbol) { > > background-color: blue; > > } =20 >=20 > The first definition would suffice if it came after any style definition > for just =E2=80=9Ca=E2=80=9D. Yeah, but the behavior would be different. I thought Ludo meant that he wanted the rules for just "a" not to apply to "a.syntax-symbol". With your version the rules for just "a" and the ones for "a.syntax-symbol" would totally both apply to "a.syntax-symbol"s. In my version, the "with class" text doesn't have a blue background. In yours, it would have. (I'd agree that it's often overkill) --Sig_/sh7qexn8dO_H+eIa.nnuV/y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl6UsZsACgkQ5xo1VCww uqUFwgf/Qqw6sgeTaAWV4kjTAuSBuQr4QZxdY/9/NIuNoGbsxBA1wJjwBdSx63BO 6VeLloHSi/hv/TPW9z8cGRLFliRfNS5w/mPbwVXGT6izOSDdR8j4dz6dHTcvFaQH KTHuNzmZwKsJoS5br2yv9Q71+8xVWFbctEbqkD8r41S1AW3YQvGM83OILu2/sLr2 Uzdh52qjLJibAI9ayeiNHa7x9ZjjiCH2CQ3apH8BDryN3t6rhMbo9geg9bedTX4B gVkQSOJKPCn47VKZ/R3O0/odccM4642jkO6vX45PKlvo5sgQN6tjEB9fRBgOHfHj DYRcLifPOC7ScdQd+0CyRNmnpyp4gA== =bcPN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/sh7qexn8dO_H+eIa.nnuV/y--