From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>
Subject: Re: 1.1.0rc2 available for testing!
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 11:36:38 +0200
Message-ID: <20200412093638.jdmogflq2admem75@pelzflorian.localdomain>
References: <878sj1qcw7.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41622)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>) id 1jNZ2g-0004SP-21
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:36:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>) id 1jNZ2f-0004zl-1F
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:36:41 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <878sj1qcw7.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 11:19:52AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> Alternately (and preferably), you can get it over IPFS.
>=20
>   ipfs ls QmeLSpj3bBV5vwieVqYkbarTxmbiiP2iAaaN6rzBPLqqRD
>   ipfs get =E2=80=A6
>=20
> If you=E2=80=99ve never used IPFS before, first run:
>=20
>   guix install go-ipfs
>   ipfs init
>=20

I also needed =E2=80=9Cipfs daemon &=E2=80=9D as you wrote for rc1.

Regards,
Florian