From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Subject: bug#40538: installer: Support uvesafb to install on machines without KMS. Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 16:58:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20200410145858.cekc55kjog3eblbu@pelzflorian.localdomain> References: <20200410125447.smn6xhcixe7hpday@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87tv1rv21e.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jMv8V-0003Gy-NX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:00:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jMv8U-0000H5-Og for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:00:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jMv8U-0000Gz-Kv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:00:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jMv8U-0000Z9-I8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:00:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tv1rv21e.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 40538@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 04:38:37PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > AIUI, uvesafb is needed for ksmcon (or presumably X11) to work, but it’s > not necessary to get the standard Linux framebuffer/console running > (indeed, you were able to ctrl-alt-f3 to get a terminal). Is this > correct? Yes, all correct. > If that’s the case, then I think it’s acceptable for now to install a > system that lacks uvesafb. Of course X11 won’t work (right?), Yes, right. > which is > not great, but people can hopefully address it at the console until we > have a better fix, possibly using ‘kernel-module-configuration-service’ > as you write. > > WDYT? I agree. I will try making a patch including your suggestions in a few hours. > > 2. Does "modprobe.d/uvesafb.conf" work? I thought there was nothing > taking care of creating “modprobe.d” automatically. I think I tested this version of the patch and it worked. One can test on QEMU by passing nomodeset (without uvesafb the installer stays black, I think). It also matches the description of kernel-module-loader-service-type that was recently added to the manual. Regards, Florian